>(i tend to believe, as a producer, that all music, as a >form of art, should be free and that no one should make a >living as a musician) most musicians don't - maybe nobody should make a living off of musicians they way that unscrupulous record labels do? I think that would be a better situation. I'm not a recording artist but couldn't musician's unions be a bit stronger in fighting the status quo of contracts and payment? Seems like the larger unions are in bed with the IIRC and the major media corps. MEK
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc Ken Odeluga
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc Michael . Elliot-Knight
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc r3dshift
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc kev
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, ... john harvey
- RE: (313) downloading, peer-to-pe... Steve @ K-os.net
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc Ken Odeluga
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc john harvey
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc J. T.
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc Michael . Elliot-Knight
- RE: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc Robert Taylor
- RE: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc Robert Taylor
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc john harvey
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc J. T.
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc J. T.
- Re: (313) downloading, peer-to-peer, etc Michael . Elliot-Knight
