Please, I didn't put any personal comments in my statement, and I'd appreciate it if you kept yours out as well. I'm not saying it's bad, or good, merely stating that there is a huge range of opinions on teh subject of techno, and one person's view of what techno is, can be completely contrary to someone els's.
Looks like you are an example of your very own statement, except you put personal slander in your mail :\ Seriously,you can't begin to classify techno by categories, because it has blossomed into the subculture it is, because of its anonymity, and it's faceless appeal. This is what makes finding good music a difficult task as well - because everyone classifies things in a little different way than others. ez... dns. On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, john harvey wrote: > it is unbelievable how so many people on this list take things completely > the wrong way, and totally out of context, the statement below being a great > example. > > > > The key phrase in that being "stuff that Brandan Nelson thinks is good > > techno". Sorry, but there may be other people with differing opinions out > > there. Just because you think something isn't techno, doesn't mean it is > > or isn't. Techno is as techno does. > > what the fu*k are you on about? > > its obvious to anyone with a tiny brain that brendan didn't mean anything > like what you're attempting to imply. > > >
