I don't mean to seem so combative, but "give it time, i bet many copycats will pop up using "real" sounds from synths." seems like you're saying that anyone using real sounds (you used UR as your reference) from synths is a copycat
so if I misunderstood you, fine. no sense in calling me a "f*cking crackhead", tough guy. jeez, techno kids used to be nice, -Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas D. Cox, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 5:26 PM Subject: Re: (313) friday records (Abacus) > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > From: "/0" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >are you saying anyone who uses real sounds in music that is > electronic-jazz > >minded is ripping off UR? LOL > > yeah thats exactly what im saying, you f*cking crackhead. can you > not read or are you just trolling for flames? > > >the machines being used to make techno were originally made to > reproduce > >real sounds without having to have 10 people there to play each > instrument. > > yeah and they didnt actually sound like any instrument. as much as > i try, my 101 just doesnt sound like a guitar. > > >a 909 has a bass drum, hi hats, snare, etc. just like a real > drum kit. > >technology limited their ability to pull off an accurate > representation and > >as these machines gave way to sampling devices, their prices fell > as did > >their demand. at this point, people started picking them up for > making all > >kinds of electronic music (and others no doubt), and things kind > of built on > >that. at some point sounding "wrong" got cool and now the synth > market is > >in the process of doing a 180 to catch up. > > wow, youre really on top of things. i of course summed this up in > my original post that you disagreed with where i pointed out how > popular virtual analogue synths are in dance music. > > >look at the old ultramarine albums if you want some heavy mixture > of > >synthetic and real sounds in a jazzy/electronic vein. your > assertion that > >someone who uses "real" sounds in tracks will be biting from UR > is just > >silly. > > i know it is, which is why you sound like an idiot for putting > words in my mouth. i pointed out that in techno theyre the only > people using OBVIOUSLY SYNTHETIC "REAL" sounds. find me 5 other > TECHNO records that are as fake sounding as the most recent UR > records have been. > > >the music has existed as long as the gear has, but it seems its > just never > >been marketed in a way that has caught your attention > > > >perhaps I misunderstand you, but at the very least, your original > statement > >could stand some clarification > > really i was very clear considering the fact that 4 days later > youve been the only person to take objection to it. all i said was > that it was interesting how they seem to be taking the route LEAST > used by techno artists: making "real" sounds with a synth, even > though they obviously sound fake. > > tom > > ________________________________________________________________ > andythepooh.com > > > >
