I bought the first electronic one but when I listen to this I can't help
but ask - "what year is this?"
I kind of torn about this because as much as I love electro - this just
isn't very fresh
sh*t - even electro "back in the day" was trying to sound futuristic but
the A side cut of this is going nowhere
the B side is about the same but then the sample cuts off just when I think
I hear the intro of some nice synthy parts
won't buy on sight but will give it further listening
the other electronic 12" they did I think is stronger
this just sounds like they've been listening to too much "Space Invaders
are Smoking Grass"
MEK
robin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ctric.com> cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: (313) M.A.W
05/26/04 08:32 AM
clips:
http://www.wattsmusic.com/audio/index.html?file=187080.rm
http://www.wattsmusic.com/audio/index.html?file=187080a.rm
very interesting
robin...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> anyone heard this new MAW electronic thing?
>
> some talk of it here....
>
> http://deephousepage.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=19;t=010521
>
> what did peeps think of the last one?
> I think I bought it, then flogged it (like at least 50% of the new chit I
> get).
> I was a bit, mmm, dunno, disappointed might be the wrong word, but, I
> dunno, guess I thought that these guys could come up with something
pretty
> interesting.
>
> think that last one was just re-works of robotnick and kraftwerk no?
>
> one of those things that you hear about, and think it might be good.
>
> I say, pull tito puente's bongos out of your backside and make us some
> flippin' techno mo fo's.
>
> *ahem* cough, cough, anyway...... what were we talking about again?
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
>
> --------------------- End of message text --------------------
>
> This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
> individual, non-business capacity and is not on
> behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
>
> PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
> e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
> telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
> give your consent to such monitoring
>
>
>
>
