i just wanna point out that "kiss" from the last MAW unreleased
project 12" is going to be a big summertime joint IMO. ultra hot
loopy older sounding house joint.
tom
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 10:26:13 -0500
>
>
>
>
>I bought the first electronic one but when I listen to this I
can't help
>but ask - "what year is this?"
>I kind of torn about this because as much as I love electro -
this just
>isn't very fresh
>sh*t - even electro "back in the day" was trying to sound
futuristic but
>the A side cut of this is going nowhere
>the B side is about the same but then the sample cuts off just
when I think
>I hear the intro of some nice synthy parts
>
>won't buy on sight but will give it further listening
>the other electronic 12" they did I think is stronger
>this just sounds like they've been listening to too much "Space
Invaders
>are Smoking Grass"
>
>MEK
>
>
>
>
robin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ctric.com> cc:
[email protected]
> Subject: Re:
(313) M.A.W
> 05/26/04 08:32
AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>clips:
>
>http://www.wattsmusic.com/audio/index.html?file=187080.rm
>
>http://www.wattsmusic.com/audio/index.html?file=187080a.rm
>
>very interesting
>
>robin...
>
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> anyone heard this new MAW electronic thing?
>>
>> some talk of it here....
>>
>> http://deephousepage.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?
ubb=get_topic;f=19;t=010521
>>
>> what did peeps think of the last one?
>> I think I bought it, then flogged it (like at least 50% of the
new chit I
>> get).
>> I was a bit, mmm, dunno, disappointed might be the wrong word,
but, I
>> dunno, guess I thought that these guys could come up with
something
>pretty
>> interesting.
>>
>> think that last one was just re-works of robotnick and
kraftwerk no?
>>
>> one of those things that you hear about, and think it might be
good.
>>
>> I say, pull tito puente's bongos out of your backside and make
us some
>> flippin' techno mo fo's.
>>
>> *ahem* cough, cough, anyway...... what were we talking about
again?
>>
>>
>>
_________________________________________________________________
>>
>> --------------------- End of message text --------------------
>>
>> This e-mail is sent by the above named in their
>> individual, non-business capacity and is not on
>> behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
>>
>> PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming
>> e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and
>> telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you
>> give your consent to such monitoring
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________
andythepooh.com
