Re: (313) Future of Movement

[Thorin Teague]

So in other words you were assuming that they DO hire help finding sponsors, 
and for some reason I was thinking they do NOT. I thought D. May more or 
less did this thing single-handedly, which is the reason behind all the 
drama. I certainly could be wrong, I'm not in the know about this. 

Even if I am right, I think they got the job done in the end. Everything 
could be done better, sure. I wouldn't object to paying a small admission 
fee (there's a Lansingfest or some such thing where you buy a $5 button that 
gets you in all week, it's just that simple). Would this reduce the 
1,000,000 attendance to 900,000? Oh, no! Obviously if people won't pay a few 
bucks for a 3 day music festival they're not all that interested anyway. 

Remember the bottom line: movement 04 was a veritable religious experience 
for most. I'm sure there's a better way, somehow, someway, to streamline how 
it's done, but the bottom line is that IT HAPPENED, which is why I try to 
tread lightly in these threads. The fact that it went down is good enough 
for me. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Surely they've done that right? Surely.........? 

They shouldn't be organising anything if they havent done that. 

what's say, $50000 payable to an ad-man when he can guarantee you millions
in sponsorship revenue?