> I mean that The A Team was aimed at kids and is patently ridiculous,
something you only appreciate when watching as an adult - Lucas has always
said his films are for kids - it's hard to view a film with a gold robot,
giant teddybear and an asthmatic baddie in black in it as anything other
than a cartoon - nostalgia for a film that enchanted you as a kid obscures
ones critical faculties somewhat.
> IMNSHO naturally :)

So cynical :(

You could adopt the same attitude about a lot of movies. Even Blade Runner
had a giant teddybear in it!! Cant movies just be fun and remembered for
what they were without feeling the need to have to analyse them from an
adult perspective?

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 9:00 AM
> To: Robert Taylor; matrix313; Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
> Subject: RE: (313) Techno Films
>
>
> on the technical side maybe but for the story line I can't see how it
compares with the A-Team.....you crazy fool :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mon 16/08/2004 10:53
> To: matrix313; Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
> Cc:
> Subject: RE: (313) Techno Films
>
>
>
> Android is a proper techno film, as are The Terminator films (T3
excepted) - the only robot films that don't make me yawn.
>
> As for Star Wars, I agree with Sean - IMO it's the most overrated film of
all time - I loved it when I was a kid, but when I saw the new editions as
an adult I realised how shoddy they were - it was comparable to watching the
A-Team again after 20 years and realising that it was aimed at people with
tiny little brains (ie children)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: matrix313 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 6:35 PM
> To: Cyclone Wehner; 313 Detroit
> Subject: Re: (313) Techno Films
>
>
> sean "I just dont *get* Star Wars at all" deason
>
############################################################################
#########
> Note:
>
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received
this email in
> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thank You.
>
############################################################################
#########
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
############################################################################
#########
> Note:
>
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received
this email in
> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thank You.
>
############################################################################
#########
>
>

Reply via email to