it's not just posting. it's the homepage to his website.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >The plain fact that his comments were ill > >conceived, poorly phrased and badly judged is not something for those > >offended to overlook, but for him to redress. Since he has made the > decision > >to post them on a forum such as this, then he must stand by them and bear > >full responsibility for any insult they have caused. > > Couldn't agree more. I felt it was rather poor choice of words no matter > what the intent was. > Unless, of course, the intent was to anger loads of people. > > This should not be swept under the carpet - if you're writing to make > yourself understood on a message board/email list then the very words you > choose are the most important factor to consider. Anyone who has used email > for any amount of time should know that (especially on the 313 list). > > It was a careless posting. > > MEK > >
