I have quite a few old EPs that have "tranctastic mixes" on them.  Alot
of the Definitive records that I have, have some sort of "trance" version of
the tune...


D


On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, M : A : T : R : I : X wrote:

> look at all of us trance lovers coming out of the closet! :^)
>
>
> on 1/28/05 6:40 AM, fab. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these words:
>
> > i have this compilation as well and it is a damn fine one if i may say
> > so.....
> > goes back to the time when there wasnt much of a difference between trance
> > and techno, when trance wasnt a dirty word. hell, there are even UR tracks
> > that i call 'trance'...
> >
> > what went wrong? i dont know..marketing maybe wanted to divide the 2.
> > or maybe trance appealed to ppl that didnt enjoy techno....or, maybe it was
> > the drugs.
> > trance was intended for ppl to space out  to and evade into utopian dreams
> > of universal love etc while techno developed into a more of a dystopian
> > urban and post-industrial aesthetic.
> >
> > just off the top of my head,
> > fab
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "M : A : T : R : I : X" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:14 PM
> > Subject: Re: (313) No Movement 2005?
> >
> >
> >> oh wait...are we 313ers still supposed to hate Trance? oops! I forgot that
> >> "trance" was supposed to be taboo. a few weeks ago I was at a Dollar Store
> >> and as I was checking out there was a CD display near the register. as I
> >> spun through the terrible selection I came across a double CD compilation
> >> on
> >> Rising High Records called "The Secret Life of Trance". it included tracks
> >> by Timo Mass and Jam & Spoon and it was only one dollar...so I bought it.
> >> I
> >> figured it would be good for a laugh or two. so while cleaning house the
> >> other day I decided to put it on and give it a listen before throwing it
> >> away, but ended up listening to it straight through. it's actually quite
> >> good! (?) I apologize, guys. it was an accident and it only happened once.
> >> I
> >> swear! I feel so dirty. but at least it wasnt "electro clash"! :)
> >>
> >> oh and regarding movement: maybe it's time to take it off of life support?
> >> it's already made history and has it's place in our hearts forever. why
> >> not
> >> just let it go? Keeping a "version" of it alive artificially or in an
> >> altered form would do nothing but tarnish the fond memories of what it
> >> once
> >> was. Have you ever had your favorite danceclub/party/event outlive it's
> >> natural lifespan? it gets pretty sad at the end. examples: Lollaplooza?
> >> Motor Lounge? The Limelight? Ministry Of Sound?
> >>
> >> DEMF: Do Not Resuscitate
> >>
> >> I have nothing against the DEMF/Movement festival or it's organizers. I
> >> performed at the very first (where I was paid quite handsomely) and what
> >> may
> >> turn out to be the very last one (where I performed for absolutely free)
> >> and
> >> would gladly do it again if they needed me to, but if the only way to keep
> >> it going is to make it an "Area One" monster rock show, then it's time to
> >> let it rest in peace and take it's rightful place as a part of the history
> >> of Detroit Techno.
> >>
> >> sean deason
> >>
> >> on 1/27/05 9:14 PM, Anton Banks (313) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these
> >> words:
> >>
> >>>>> and a trendy headliner would be good too.
> >>>
> >>> I can see it now- "Now playing on the trance stage..."
> >>>
> >>> <<said with extreme sarcasm>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to