I love those Volume compilations. I only got 1 through 4 and on CD only. :-(

I know what you mean about the "Great Divide". I caught the tail end of the
old style just as I was getting into this music.

I was ok with trance and that first Oakenfold mix until EVERYBODY started
copying it. Radio, clubs, it was just everywhere and overwhelming. You
couldn't throw a rock without hitting another person who claimed to be a
"rave" DJ. In my area, all these trance DJs moved in overnight and claimed
to have exclusive rights to electronic dance. Nevermind that there were a
whole host of people doing all sorts of things that benefited everyone
before that point. Once the trance bubble burst, those of us who were left
got stuck holding the bag and having to explain all the nonesense that the
new crowd of trance people brought in with them.

I'm also a bit sour about being herded into the mainstream conception of
electronic dance music. People immediately associated "techno" (and
therefore me) with "trance". I got stuck (and still to this day) having to
answer to friends and others commenting "you still play that stuff? I hate
progressive!"

I just grew to associate trance with those people who only know of that one
end of the spectrum. It's not so much "trance" the music itself, per se,
that bothers me. It's all these connotaions associated with it.

-Anton
www.antonbanks.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 10:34 AM
To: M : A : T : R : I : X
Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (313) No Movement 2005?


I'll readily admit that I like trance music - of the variety that came out
on the Volume compilation sets.  There are quite a few Detroit artists on
those. Check out these track listings:
http://www.discogs.com/release/88553
http://www.discogs.com/release/69311
http://www.discogs.com/release/17822
http://www.discogs.com/release/17824
http://www.discogs.com/release/17825
http://www.discogs.com/release/17826

but this is trance before the "Great Divide" that got its start in the
early 90s and by 94-95 was well on its way to pushing trance and techno
apart.
I'd like to know - what was the first "Trance" record that put the massive
build-ups and breakdowns on their way to the history books of dance music?

I know Richie Hawtin and Speedy J were lumped in the trance music very
early on - I'd say that they are two of the only producers that most techno
and trance fans can agree on.
They sure knew how to abuse the 808/909 drum rolls as well.
Everyone goes on about Oakenfold but i put more blame on Paul Van Dyk and
Sven Väth and what was going on in Germany and Goa, India for the way that
trance became "progressive house/trance".

MEK





             "M : A : T : R :
             I : X"
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                          To
             .com>                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
                                       <[email protected]>
             01/28/05 05:14 AM                                          cc

                                                                   Subject
                                       Re: (313) No Movement 2005?










oh wait...are we 313ers still supposed to hate Trance? oops! I forgot that
"trance" was supposed to be taboo. a few weeks ago I was at a Dollar Store
and as I was checking out there was a CD display near the register. as I
spun through the terrible selection I came across a double CD compilation
on
Rising High Records called "The Secret Life of Trance". it included tracks
by Timo Mass and Jam & Spoon and it was only one dollar...so I bought it. I
figured it would be good for a laugh or two. so while cleaning house the
other day I decided to put it on and give it a listen before throwing it
away, but ended up listening to it straight through. it's actually quite
good! (?) I apologize, guys. it was an accident and it only happened once.
I
swear! I feel so dirty. but at least it wasnt "electro clash"! :)

oh and regarding movement: maybe it's time to take it off of life support?
it's already made history and has it's place in our hearts forever. why not
just let it go? Keeping a "version" of it alive artificially or in an
altered form would do nothing but tarnish the fond memories of what it once
was. Have you ever had your favorite danceclub/party/event outlive it's
natural lifespan? it gets pretty sad at the end. examples: Lollaplooza?
Motor Lounge? The Limelight? Ministry Of Sound?

DEMF: Do Not Resuscitate

I have nothing against the DEMF/Movement festival or it's organizers. I
performed at the very first (where I was paid quite handsomely) and what
may
turn out to be the very last one (where I performed for absolutely free)
and
would gladly do it again if they needed me to, but if the only way to keep
it going is to make it an "Area One" monster rock show, then it's time to
let it rest in peace and take it's rightful place as a part of the history
of Detroit Techno.

sean deason

on 1/27/05 9:14 PM, Anton Banks (313) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered these
words:

>>> and a trendy headliner would be good too.
>
> I can see it now- "Now playing on the trance stage..."
>
> <<said with extreme sarcasm>>
>





Reply via email to