What a load of crap that tune is - not only is the chord progression bad
but the synthy strings coming up behind it are totally Tiestolicious. It
sounds like an old BT track. Blech.
MEK
"David Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/07/2007 01:37:41 PM:
> On 2/7/07, kent williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If anyone hasn't heard it it's at http://www.myspace.com/arilbrikha
> > It has a similar chord progression, but not the same. Not a bad track
> > but Aril's in danger of being embraced by the progressive DJs for
> > stuff like this. Maybe Salsa and Dickweed will pick up on it.
>
> I kept my mouth shut the first time around ... but ... seriously.
>
> That chord progression, in whatever variation, is not something I want
> to hear in a techno track, especially on a weak sounding synth sound.
> Maybe in some pseudo-GangOfFour discopunk hipster version with lots of
> guitar and silly lyrics making fun of dance parties I could handle it.
> But I can't listen to it without laughing. I don't know what to call
> it, prog, trance, whatever, but I can't even listen to the whole thing
> in one sitting.
>
> Every time I hear that chord progression, it reminds of me of early
> 90's rave music, and also "Good Vibrations" by Marky Mark and the
> Funky Bunch, and Haddaway "What Is Love". It's the ultimate dance
> party anthem chord progression. Kind of like the Louie Louie chord
> progression was for rock bands of days gone by.
>
> As far as Swedish music, I'll take new Adam Beyer and Par Grindvik any
> day over this Aril track.
>
> ~David
