You guys are much too harsh on it. The track isn't that bad. Not exactly earth shattering, but its fine as background music.
For those that hate the tune so much, maybe "Tiestolingus" would be a more appropriate expression than "Tiestolicious"??? > Tiestolicious - that's brilliant! > > On 08/02/2007, at 7:24 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> What a load of crap that tune is - not only is the chord >> progression bad >> but the synthy strings coming up behind it are totally >> Tiestolicious. It >> sounds like an old BT track. Blech. >> >> MEK >> >> "David Powers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/07/2007 01:37:41 PM: >> >> >>> On 2/7/07, kent williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> If anyone hasn't heard it it's at http://www.myspace.com/arilbrikha >>>> It has a similar chord progression, but not the same. Not a bad >>>> track >>>> but Aril's in danger of being embraced by the progressive DJs for >>>> stuff like this. Maybe Salsa and Dickweed will pick up on it. >>>> >>> >>> I kept my mouth shut the first time around ... but ... seriously. >>> >>> That chord progression, in whatever variation, is not something I >>> want >>> to hear in a techno track, especially on a weak sounding synth sound. >>> Maybe in some pseudo-GangOfFour discopunk hipster version with >>> lots of >>> guitar and silly lyrics making fun of dance parties I could handle >>> it. >>> But I can't listen to it without laughing. I don't know what to call >>> it, prog, trance, whatever, but I can't even listen to the whole >>> thing >>> in one sitting. >>> >>> Every time I hear that chord progression, it reminds of me of early >>> 90's rave music, and also "Good Vibrations" by Marky Mark and the >>> Funky Bunch, and Haddaway "What Is Love". It's the ultimate dance >>> party anthem chord progression. Kind of like the Louie Louie chord >>> progression was for rock bands of days gone by. >>> >>> As far as Swedish music, I'll take new Adam Beyer and Par Grindvik >>> any >>> day over this Aril track. >>> >>> ~David >>> >> >> > > >
