someone wake me up when they get out the kiddie pool and mud. or might I suggest just chasing eachother in a circle for similar results.
;) agree to disagree, it's the art of mature discussion. --- "J.T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that's the whole point. who cares with being down > with a culture or not. who CARES! i have a great cd > that is supposedly traditional south american indian > music, but it's actually made by music professors > from sao paolo. it's great, i like it, i could care > less about how real they are etc. where do you draw > the line on these judgement calls of realness > anyways, and does it ever have positive effects? i > mean what is the point? did chi people get all > protective when detroit did their take on house? > probably some did. i don't have time for that sort > of nonsense. music is meant to bleed all over the > place, it's in its nature, it's what it do. trace a > style back and you can keep tracing it all the way > back to africa. you don't have to like the new > permutations, but insisting that new permutations > are wrong is just assanine imo. i don't care if > indie rockers start doing some retarded take on > techno and get famous for it, go for it, i won't > enjoy it and i'll talk sh*t on it and give it a > stupid name, but it has as much a right to exist as > anything else. this is all art 101 if you ask me, > but tmo is acting like it's a sport of keepin it > real. some of the best music of all time is made by > ultra reclusive socially retarded people who could > care less about being down with a scene or culture, > they just make music. or maybe they're gregarious > a-holes, who knows. i don't know spank rock and i > don't know their motivations or personalities and i > don't presume to know. i keep hearing tom assert > that they are fronting on bmore club, but i think > their name is supposed to be a concept in itself, > it's spank rock. yes, it's got a rock attitude. it's > not bmore club per se, it's in the name for godsakes > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > >From: /0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Jun 27, 2007 8:01 PM > >To: 313@hyperreal.org > >Subject: Re: (313) Justice > > > >y0y0y0y0y0y0y0y00y00y0yy0y0y0y0y0yyyy0y0yy00y0y00y0y0y0y0y0y00y0y0y0y0y0yy0, > > > >i dont see why this even matters anyways, either > music is good or it isnt. > > > >tom has the for-real-o-meter though, for real. G. > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Rob G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <313@hyperreal.org> > >Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:47 PM > >Subject: Re: (313) Justice > > > > > >> >you can add your own influence to something > else. hiphop culture is > >>>all over the globe now, and it has been mutated > and added on to. i > >>>personally think all of this stuff sucks, but at > least it is being > >>>done by people who live that culture as best as > it is done in their > >>>country. spank rock and t&a live down the street, > theyre spectators to > >>>a culture they then represent. > >> > >>>it wouldnt matter if they were purple if they > were down with the > >>>culture. but theyre not so it doesnt matter. > >> > >> so how are they *not* down with the culture? > What would they be doing > >> differently if they were down with the culture? > >> > >> I always always got the impression from the early > hollertronix/the > >> rub/moneystudies/et all that their whole vibe was > "we're not you guys, but > >> we're *down* with what you are doing" (with > respect to the baltimore > >> producers and such). > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > >> Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search > >> that gives answers, not web links. > >> > http://mobile.yahoo.com/mobileweb/onesearch?refer=1ONXIC > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Got a little couch potato? Check out fun summer activities for kids. http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+kids&cs=bz
