but does crappy sound quality destroy sound systems? i'm asking because i don't know. anyway, most of the time the dj isn't an idiot, it's just a matter of bad communication between the sound man and the dj (or NO communication - how often does a sound man reside in the venue especially if it's a club?), and the dj is probably hard of hearing. ;P
On 10/24/07, Alan Heneghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You will still be sending a bad signal to the limitier = crap sound quality. > You can get the Pioneers to sound OK, if you know what you are doing and > understand gain structure. > > > > > > > Alan Heneghan > > > > > > From: Frank Glazer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:27:12 -0400 > > To: Alan Heneghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, list 313 <313@hyperreal.org> > > Subject: Re: (313) votes > > > > i'm not an audio engineer, nor do i play one on the internet, but > wouldn't > > proper preamp limiting/compression solve this problem just as > well? > > On > > 10/24/07, Alan Heneghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gains on the > > back are to stop IDIOT DJs turning them up and destroying sound > > > > systems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alan Heneghan > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Simon > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:36:48 +1000 > > > To: > > 'list 313' <313@hyperreal.org> > > > Subject: RE: (313) votes > > > > > > Doesn't > > the 32 have the gains on the back so you literally have to blindly > > > reach > > behind the mixer? Completely impractical. > > > > > > For fast and aggressive > > EQing and x/channel fading the Pioneer is far more > > > sturdy than A&H I find. > > For smooth, delicate mixing the 62 wins hands down. > > > This is comparing a > > 600 with a 62. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Benoît Pueyo > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 24 October 2007 6:25 > > AM > > > To: list 313 > > > Subject: Re: (313) votes > > > > > > I have A&H XONE 32. > > Except the fact it has 3 channels, it already beats > > > every pionner I got in > > hands (300,500,600) though i've never tried the 800. > > > > > > Anyways I dont > > think Pioneer have changed thier stupid EQs cutting > > > everything when you > > low too much the bass. A&H are soft, precise, and > > > still have punchy efft. > > Hooray for the filters aswell. > > > > > > So forget Pioneer... Now between 62 and > > 92 I would say 62 becasue its > > > cheaper, and for the extra $$$ 92 doesnt > > bring much more technically > > > talking (except if youre fan of all these > > hawtinesque concetual effects > > > and stuff). > > > -- > > > Benoît. > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > > >> > > >> can I have your votes pls..? > > >> > > > > >> Allen & Heath 62 > > >> Allen & Heath 92 > > >> Pioneer DJM 800 > > >> > > >> ? > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > peace, > > frank > > dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com > > > -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
