It is an intriguing idea, I do agree with that.  However, the whole thing
about "removing the ego" is canceled out by "multiple VJ/DJ people"
controlling the banks of bio feedback sensors.
What you would accomplish by this is taking out the one ego and replacing
it with a small group of egos - which can be even more elitist and
excluding than a single DJ.

If they are controlling the feedback, is it safe to assume they are
selecting and manipulating what sounds the dancers are making via their
movement/emotions?
If so, then aren't the controllers injecting their egos into their
performance or the control of the performance?  I could imagine that after
a while the accusations of egotism often leveled at DJs would just shift to
the controllers of "extensive banks of bio feedback sensors".

That said, there is a couple, I think in Amsterdam, that make experimental
instruments, one of which is a massive Theramin type dance floor.  I'll see
if I can find their website.  I think you'd find it very interesting.

MEK



still want to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/01/2007 08:49:45 PM:

>
> > well, you either have a person being the control mechanism (DJ) who can
> > observe the room, take in emotional levels, combine them with her/his
own,
> > and spit back out something unexpected (like stopping the music and
telling
> > a story to the audience that has some relevance to what's going on)
> >
> > or
> >
> > you have a machine take in parameters, numbers, equations, and mix them
> > with something that has been programmed into it (and a slower learning
> > curve) and then spitting it back out hopefully matching where an
audience
> > wants to go
>
> I was very inspired by sci -fi writer Paul J. McAuley who described a
future
> rave  where multiple VJ/DJ people controlled extensive banks of bio
feedback
> sensors ..  in this system everyone in the audience provides input and
> everyone is able to filter and feedback the input sources onto the system
> which is an interconnected series of sound systems, holographic
projectors,
> lasers and lights.
>
> There is no specific centre to the situation .. it is a sprawling
> massive of vibe
> which he calls "the constant Wave".
>
> It was one of the more interesting future account of a rave that I
> had ever read.
>
> http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue33/books.html
>
> ..
>
> While I respect the right of a few aficionados on the list to
> protect their view
> of reality around music.  My history runs deep into the cultures of rave
and
> sound systems that rally the audiences for electronic music and I
continue
> to find interest in the ways that these communities form and evolve.
>
> In my area, raving developed completely new music audiences and ways of
> experiencing music.  While this format may have become settled in recent
> years, I still think its interesting to push and progress the format.
>
> I know that the "rave" experience has inspired many artist in their work.
>
> My approach is to continue to create new types of environments both
technical
> and social that can stimulate new ideas in culture.
>
> The fact that this might present a challenge to the status quo is a
> good thing!
>
> .simon

Reply via email to