Hey T, thanks for taking the time to respond with some thought etc

> There's nothing invalid about this, but I reckon it's only one part of the
> issue. On the one hand, I recall listening to Monolake's "Tangent II" when
> it came out and thinking it was the most 'futuristic' thing I'd heard in a
> long time. I don't think I've had that feeling since outside of perhaps some
> insane newer hip hop (and it still sounds like one of the "newest" things
> I've ever heard). I don't think it's a bad thing per se, but I think those
> sort of stark contrasts are probably rairer now and will probably continue

Yeah, it's only a part of the problem, I recognized that at the
beginning of my rambling/rant..I think it's been a big part of the
problem though, although it is beginning to change. Personally I agree
on Monolake, and I know you are a real music lover...but there seem to
be/have been a lot of electronic music fans who are novelty junkies
more than anything else. "Newness" is so entirely subjective, but most
electronic music fans are so arrogant about dance music they act as if
it is objective and an actual trait of "Techno". I would argue it is
not at all, no moreso than in any other genre of music. There are
surely people who have different reference points than us, who even at
the time could have heard Monolake and related it to something else
familiar to them, something we could not see. An example from my own
life would be years back when I was into real hard acid stuff, I'd
play it for my dad...and he loved it, but insisted it reminded him of
dixieland jazz, and he'd actually jam along to it on acoustic guitar
(while I whined "No, no, nooo!"). You never know exactly how other
people hear music, but typical electronic music fans have this big
chip on their shoulder about how cutting edge they and their music are
and I find it pretty ignorant, and arrogant. Electronic music needs to
get outside it's own bubble. One of the many reasons I have so much
respect for Submerge, C-B-S, and Rush Hour is that these people
clearly have a very holistic view of music, but are very secure in
their own identity.

> What I think is probably a larger factor is the fact that U.S. radio and
> television don't support upcoming and independent music (and especially
> dance music) in the same way as it is supported in Europe. Add to that the

Everything is so localized in Europe too, it kind of lessens the
faceless/mechanical impression electronic music can give off...but
that support you mention is definitely key. I feel like it became
circular though...Why/how could they begin to support something that
treats itself as a novelty, that doesn't respect itself, where fans
can accept very few established artists/sounds...they're sacrificed in
the push for "innovation" and "new music". I should emphasize that I
feel this is changing in the past few years, after the fall of club
culture etc...I'm very positive about where things are heading.

> be sustained. Perhaps regional scenes can flare up occasionally, but I don't
> see that American dance music will be waving the flag for much longer like
> this.

Not like this, but the one thing you can count on is things
change...You really never know...I could completely imagine, in 30
years, Detroit/American electronic music going through the same thing
country blues did. When country blues was first around, it was "negro
music", considered low-brow, it was given zero respect, and forgotten
rather quickly. 30 years later it's genius was realized and it
underwent a resurgence that far surpassed it's original popularity,
and it became one of the primary inspirations for rock n roll and
modern folk music, genres that have become immortal, they're never
going anywhere...neither is country blues. of course some genres do
get lost in the ages (ever heard of skiffle? do we need to make more
hip-house? well maybe :P) Electronic music fans are so quick to try
and hammer the nails in the coffin of the music they are supposedly
fans of, I think it's really misguided and disrespectful to the spirit
of music...

Sorry to ramble, I don't doubt most people see things another way,
never mind me..

Reply via email to