----- Original Message ----- Da : "JT Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A : "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Oggetto : Re: (313) C2 at Carnegie Hall, well sort of Data : Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:00:44 -0500
> > seems you agree with /0 then..... > > wtf? he's saying techno music is far too simple to > interest classical musicians, i just pointed out that 1. a > modern day mozart provides proof otherwise and 2. techno > is more rhythmically complex than classical 3. he's > mirroring the cultural elitism of widely discredited and > criticized prejudiced white guys from the 40's. sorry JT, i didn't mean it as an insult.... > > for what it's worth, i view the classical-techno > > crossover thing with some suspicion and i find the > > results a tad amusing, like a novelty or a gimmick. i > get the idea that > > doesn't that apply to any time artists established in one > genre step into a pretty different one? has nothing to do > with the results, more your pre-conceived notions > > > (this is obviously just my opinion so i'm not trying to > > push it as fact) > > yep please help me dispel my pre-conceived notions by suggesting some techno-classical cross-over stuff that you find good and not "gimmicky". in other words, please school me. > > anybody who thinks tom is just another troll should read > his musical writings on his blog or check his mixes. he > talks a lot of bs but he's pretty good at explaining it > and it comes from a seriously intense music lover... i don't think you were referring to me specifically but i don't find tom a troll but rather far too opinionated for me to engage in any sort of dialectic discourse regarding music.
