did my message not come thru? it was about movement. and i agree with /0, pretty much, minus the enthusiasm
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is nothing about Movement in this thread. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Williams, Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 9:42 AM > To: /0; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Re: Re: (313) 4 more Movement acts > > > Hey Reds1ht > > It would be more interesting if you stopped being so aggressive and > argumentative to various individuals on this list. > > Do many on this list even value your contribution/trolling to the > various discussions? > > > G > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: /0 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 22 April 2008 01:52 > To: Fred Heutte; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Re: Re: (313) 4 more Movement acts > > "It would be at least borderline interesting if you would respond to > what I actually wrote." -Fred Heutte > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fred Heutte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 9:49 PM > Subject: Fw: Re: Re: (313) 4 more Movement acts > > > "well then the prevalent view here is wrong" > > So it always seems coming from you. > > fh > > ------ mail forwarded, original message follows ------ > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[email protected] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] </0> > Subject: Re: Re: (313) 4 more Movement acts > Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:22:42 -0400 > > well then the prevalent view here is wrong. the festival works best > when it books diverse acts to pays its bills and perpetuate its own > existence. big deal, so you wont like every act, but without the other > 75 percent, the 25 percent you want wouldnt have a festival to play at. > and for every 313 member that wants that 25 percent, there is someone > out there looking for the dnb stuff they are booking, or this or that. > just because YOU dont dig it, doesn't mean its invalid and has no place > at the festival. > > again, it is detroit's electronic music festival. not the detroit > electronic music festival. furthermore, it's pretty obvious that its > not a festival dedicated to detroit music. even the first blessed years > were not as detroit-centric as it "could" have been. > > and thank god for that. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fred Heutte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 8:33 PM > Subject: Fw: Re: (313) 4 more Movement acts > > > It would be at least borderline interesting if you would respond to what > I actually wrote. Maybe somewhere else someone is demanding that > "Movement 2008: Detroit's Electronic Music Festival" be only about > Detroit techmo. But not here. The prevalent view on [email protected] > has always been that the festival works best when it represents -all- of > Detroit's electronic music diversity, not just techno. > > fh > > ------ mail forwarded, original message follows ------ > > To: [email protected] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] </0> > Subject: Re: (313) 4 more Movement acts > Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:57:31 -0400 > > as has been said, its not a detroit techno festival, its detroits > electronic music festival. and Im glad. a yearly festival dedicated to > any sub-genre would get boring and increasingly hard to market. > > detroit has more people on the lineup than any one other city by FAR, so > you, being a fan of detroit techno, should be happy with that. > > this list needs to snap out of this > demf-is-a-celebration-of-detroit-techno > mindset, because it just leads to cyclical wastes of time in the form of > all this whining about lineups > > >
