On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:28 PM, kent williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the implication, Frank, is that Mike Banks is in a better > position to judge the history of techno and it's origins than you are.
yeah? and? so? so mike banks says kraftwerk is the be all and end all of techno. so what? while i have nothing but respect for mike, and wouldn't for a second doubt his knowledge nor his personal influence on techno, he's just one dude. just as kraftwerk is one group. just as mojo was one dude playing a wide variety of artists. > This seems like a pretty meaningless debate. Techno happened because > of a lot of people and influences, my point exactly!!! peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
