> On 13 Jun 2019, at 17:00, Mark Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/13/19 4:02 AM, William Brown wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12 Jun 2019, at 17:36, Mark Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/repl-agmt-status-design.html
>> 
>> Looks great!
>> 
>> Instead of "Success" we could use "Healthy" because replication isn't a 
>> success/fail, it's a longterm "good/bad" IE healthy/failing state. So 
>> perhaps instead of success/warning/error, we have 
>> "healthy/delayed/warning/error" instead? Additionally, on warning + error, 
>> we log those to error log by default so that an admin can "see" past errors, 
>> and when they "resolve" a resolution is also posted to the error log too?
> Really there are only three states: working, delayed, and broken. What about: 
>  Good, Warning, Error?  FYI if this does not get pushed today we will a very 
> important deadline (in fact it will mean all the bugs slated for the next 
> release will be missed!!!!)  So I don't want to keep debating "names" for 
> much longer...

Look, anything that isn't so ... I dunno. "Single action" focused but conveys 
that the service is operating as expected. I think good may not be the right 
term either from an admin point of view. So Healthy/Warning,  
Operational/Delayed, Green/Amber/Red also works from a monitoring case. 



>> 
>> Date is json should be ISO 8601 format instead?
>> 
>> 2019-06-13T07:53:20+00:00
> I will look into this, but we are running our of time as I mentioned above.  
> Maybe I will just drop the date for now...

Fair, we can add this later then - after all it's json so we can change it 
without breaking things.


Just as a mild concern, I know that there are RH deadlines to meet, but I don't 
like that leaking into rushing work upstream :(

>> 
>> I hope this helps!
>> 
>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 389-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives: 
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>> —
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> William Brown
>> 
>> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
>> SUSE Labs
>> _______________________________________________
>> 389-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to