I am running RHEL 6. Why does the scan show the vulnerabilities on the port that directory administration server is using? On May 28, 2014 8:25 PM, "Noriko Hosoi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, as you mentioned, all of the CVEs are quite old (older than > RHEL-6). For instance, the last one CVE-2009-1956 was fixed in > apr-util-1.2.7-7.el5_3.1. As long as you use RHEL-6, the CVEs you listed > are all fixed. Also, please note that the CVEs are all httpd related, not > 389-ds. > > CVE: > CVE-2008-0005 > CVE-2007-6388 > CVE-2007-6422 > CVE-2007-6420 > CVE-2007-5000 > CVE-2007-6421 > CVE-2008-1678 > > CVE-2007-1862 > CVE-2007-3847 > CVE-2007-3304 > CVE-2006-5752 > CVE-2007-1863 > > CVE-2009-1891 > CVE-2009-1955 > CVE-2009-1191 > CVE-2009-0023 > CVE-2009-1956 > CVE-2009-1195 > CVE-2009-1890 > > John Trump wrote: > > I have a system running 389-ds that was scanned using retna. Retna showed > vulnerabilities which are fairly old. Can anyone confirm that these were > fixed. Only thing using port 9830 is the admin-serv. Below are the rpm > versions I have installed and the CVE's retna supposidly detected. > > 389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.el6.x86_64 > 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch > 389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64 > 389-admin-console-1.1.8-5.fc19.noarch > 389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch > 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch > 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64 > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.25-1.el6.x86_64 > 389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.el6.x86_64 > 389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch > 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-5.fc19.noarch > > Audit ID: 6310 Vul ID: N/A > Risk Level: Medium > Sev Code: Category II > PCI Level: Medium (Fail) - CVSS Score > CVSS Score: 5 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P] > BugTraq ID 27234,26838,27236,27237 > CVE: CVE-2008-0005,CVE-2007-6388,CVE-2007-6422,CVE-2007-64 > 20,CVE-2007-5000,CVE-2007-6421,CVE-2008-1678 > CCE: N/A > Exploit: No > IAV: N/A > STIG: > Context: TCP:9830 > Result: Success > Tested Value: BR T WB Server: > > (Apache(\([[]^)]*\))?/((2\.((2(\.[[]0-7])?)|(0(\.([[]1-5]?[[]0-9]|6[[]0-2])) > > ?)|(1(\..*)?)))|(1\.((3(\.([[]1-3]?[[]0-9]|40))?)|([[]0-2](\..*)?)))|(0+\..*)) > ($|[[]^0-9.]([[]^(]*\([[]^R][[]^)]*\))*[[]^()]*$)) > Found Value: Server: Apache/2.2##Content-Length: 301##Connection: > close##Content-Type: text/html; > charset[=]iso-8859-1####<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC > "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">#<html><head>#<title>404 Not > Found</title>#</head><body>#<h1>Not Found</h1> > (truncated...) > > Audit ID: 6059 Vul ID: N/A > Risk Level: Medium > Sev Code: Category II > PCI Level: Medium (Fail) - CVSS Score > CVSS Score: 5 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N] > BugTraq ID 24215,24645,25489,24649,24553 > CVE: CVE-2007-1862,CVE-2007-3847,CVE-2007-3304,CVE-2006-57 > 52,CVE-2007-1863 > CCE: N/A > Exploit: No > IAV: N/A > STIG: > Context: TCP:9830 > Result: Success > Tested Value: RR T WB > > (Apache(\([[]^)]*\))?/(2\.2(\.[[]0-5])?)($|[[]^0-9.]([[]^(]*\([[]^R][[]^)]*\) > )*[[]^()]*$)) > Found Value: Apache/2.2 > > Audit ID: 9820 Vul ID: N/A > Risk Level: Medium > Sev Code: Category II > PCI Level: High (Fail) - CVSS Score > CVSS Score: 7.8 [AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C] > BugTraq ID 35565,35253,35623,35251,34663,35221,35115 > CVE: CVE-2009-1891,CVE-2009-1955,CVE-2009-1191,CVE-2009-00 > 23,CVE-2009-1956,CVE-2009-1195,CVE-2009-1890 > CCE: N/A > Exploit: Yes > IAV: N/A > STIG: > Context: TCP:9830 > Result: Success > Tested Value: APACHE(-ADVANCEDEXTRANETSERVER)?/2\.2(\.(1[[]01]|[[]0 > -9])(\.[[]0-9]+)*)?($|[[]^0-9.]) > Found Value: APACHE/2.2 > > > > > -- > 389 users mailing > [email protected]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users > > > > -- > 389 users mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >
-- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
