Rich, I’d prefer to email you directly… nothing personal… [email protected]
m. Mark L. Boyce Senior Identity Management Analyst University of California, Office of the President 415 20th Street Oakland, CA 94612 Office: 510.987.9681 Cell: 209.851.0196 From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 4:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair On 07/07/2015 05:35 PM, Mark Boyce wrote: Rich, I am able to get the core dump and it appears to be a segmentation fault when modifying the replication agreement… anything specific from the dump that would be helpful? Not sure. Can you provide the full stack trace? Be sure to obscure/remove any sensitive information first. If you don't feel comfortable about that, just email me the stack trace. Thanks, m. Mark L. Boyce Senior Identity Management Analyst University of California, Office of the President From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:59 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair On 07/07/2015 11:49 AM, Mark Boyce wrote: Rich, The version of 389-ds-base is 1.3.3.10-1.fc22.x89-64 and it’s the same behavior running the agreement against AD 2003 or AD 2012. By “two pairs” in mean to indicate that I have two winsyncsubtree pair attributes; i.e ou=people,dc=example,dc=org:cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org and ou=people,dc=example,dc=org:ou=administrators,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org I can either modify the sync agreement using ldapmodify or from the GUI with “Initialize Full Re-synchronization” and as soon as I hit enter after adding another winsyncsubtreepair value the server can’t be contacted and must be restarted. That sounds like a crash - http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#debugging-crashes By “in-scope”, I mean to say that I cannot use a single windows subtree in the agreement; i.e. cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org. Does that add clarity? Mark L. Boyce Senior Identity Management Analyst University of California, Office of the President From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rich Megginson Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:22 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair On 07/07/2015 10:07 AM, Mark Boyce wrote: Good Morning, Has anyone else seen this behavior; after configuring Winsync I add one or perhaps two “pairs” to the sync agreement (ds:AD) Firstly - what version of 389-ds-base? rpm -q 389-ds-base What version of Windows/AD? 2012 R2? I don't know what you mean by 'two "pairs"'. and run a full sync successfully. Upon subsequent attempt to add another pair the dirsrv abends (nothing in the logs) What commands are you running? How do you know the dirsrv abends? That is, if there is nothing in the logs, what commands are you running to see the failure? and the modify operation fails (either via CLI or GUI). This is critical to our org as the AD structure doesn’t lend it’s self to a single “in-scope” OU… Also not sure what you mean by "single in-scope OU". Thanks, m. Mark L. Boyce Senior Identity Management Analyst University of California, Office of the President 415 20th Street Oakland, CA 94612 Office: 510.987.9681 Cell: 209.851.0196 -- 389 users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
