Hi Mark,

thanks for the info. Bug is easy to reproduce. I have created internal bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241497

And I will create the upstream in a moment.

Thanks and regards,

German.


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Boyce" <[email protected]>
> To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." 
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 5:06:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair
> 
> 
> 
> Rich,
> 
> 
> 
> I’d prefer to email you directly… nothing personal… [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> m.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mark L. Boyce
> 
> Senior Identity Management Analyst
> 
> University of California, Office of the President
> 
> 415 20 th Street
> 
> Oakland, CA 94612
> 
> Office: 510.987.9681
> 
> Cell: 209.851.0196
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rich
> Megginson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 4:53 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/07/2015 05:35 PM, Mark Boyce wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Rich,
> 
> 
> 
> I am able to get the core dump and it appears to be a segmentation fault when
> modifying the replication agreement… anything specific from the dump that
> would be helpful?
> 
> 
> Not sure. Can you provide the full stack trace? Be sure to obscure/remove any
> sensitive information first. If you don't feel comfortable about that, just
> email me the stack trace.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> m.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mark L. Boyce
> 
> Senior Identity Management Analyst
> 
> University of California, Office of the President
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Rich
> Megginson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:59 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/07/2015 11:49 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Rich,
> 
> 
> 
> The version of 389-ds-base is 1.3.3.10-1.fc22.x89-64 and it’s the same
> behavior running the agreement against AD 2003 or AD 2012.
> 
> By “two pairs” in mean to indicate that I have two winsyncsubtree pair
> attributes; i.e ou=people,dc=example,dc=org:cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org
> and ou=people,dc=example,dc=org:ou=administrators,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org
> 
> I can either modify the sync agreement using ldapmodify or from the GUI with
> “Initialize Full Re-synchronization” and as soon as I hit enter after adding
> another winsyncsubtreepair value the server can’t be contacted and must be
> restarted.
> 
> 
> That sounds like a crash -
> http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#debugging-crashes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> By “in-scope”, I mean to say that I cannot use a single windows subtree in
> the agreement; i.e. cn=Users,dc=ad,dc=example,dc=org.
> 
> 
> 
> Does that add clarity?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mark L. Boyce
> 
> Senior Identity Management Analyst
> 
> University of California, Office of the President
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Rich
> Megginson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 9:22 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [389-users] winsyncsubtreepair
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/07/2015 10:07 AM, Mark Boyce wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Good Morning,
> 
> 
> 
> Has anyone else seen this behavior; after configuring Winsync I add one or
> perhaps two “pairs” to the sync agreement (ds:AD)
> 
> 
> Firstly - what version of 389-ds-base? rpm -q 389-ds-base
> What version of Windows/AD? 2012 R2?
> 
> I don't know what you mean by 'two "pairs"'.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> and run a full sync successfully. Upon subsequent attempt to add another pair
> the dirsrv abends (nothing in the logs)
> 
> 
> What commands are you running? How do you know the dirsrv abends? That is, if
> there is nothing in the logs, what commands are you running to see the
> failure?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> and the modify operation fails (either via CLI or GUI). This is critical to
> our org as the AD structure doesn’t lend it’s self to a single “in-scope”
> OU…
> 
> 
> Also not sure what you mean by "single in-scope OU".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> m.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mark L. Boyce
> 
> Senior Identity Management Analyst
> 
> University of California, Office of the President
> 
> 415 20 th Street
> 
> Oakland, CA 94612
> 
> Office: 510.987.9681
> 
> Cell: 209.851.0196
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Reply via email to