William, Thank you for your reply. I really appreciate it.
--Derek On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:54 AM, William Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 13:23 -0600, Derek Belcher wrote: > > Hi guys! > > > > What version of 389ds is the equivalent to the RHDS packages? Currently I > > am on Centos 6 and planning on upgrading all of my severs to Centos 7 to > > get the newer 389ds packages, here is a list of my current packages: > > > > > 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64 > > I *think* this corresponds to RHDS 9. Perhaps read the docs on > access.redhat.com > to get an idea of the versions as I believe they may list the exact > 389-ds-base > version that matches. > > > > > > > I would like to know the current supported packages or stable versions > for > > Centos 7 that are equal to the RHDS versions, I just dont want to be on > the > > bleeding edge. Does that make sense? > > > > Also is there an upgrade path that I need to be following, any caveats > that > > I need to be cognizant of? > > Even on centos 7 you would not be on the bleeding edge. The team is very > careful > about all commits, and review, as well as testing thoroughly what we do > (Have a > look at the project trac to see what I mean). Only at certain stages do we > backport fixes to the "stable" versions. Finally, the "newer" versions > such as > 1.3.X, will be getting the same fixes as 1.2.X, so really you gain very > little > from running an older version. Bleeding edge is checking out and running > git > master, and even then, I feel very confident running that on some of my > systems. > :) > > So you would be very safe running el7 and 389-ds-base 1.3.X that is > available > there, and I encourage you to! > > Sincerely, > > William Brown, > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-users@%(host_name)s > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected] >
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
