I think as a general rule of thumb: RHEL 5 = RHDS 8
RHEL 6 = RHDS 9 RHEL 7 = RHDS 10 Paul M. Whitney E-mail: [email protected] Sent from my browser. On Nov 17, 2015, at 02:23 PM, Derek Belcher <[email protected]> wrote: Hi guys! What version of 389ds is the equivalent to the RHDS packages? Currently I am on Centos 6 and planning on upgrading all of my severs to Centos 7 to get the newer 389ds packages, here is a list of my current packages: # cat /etc/issue CentOS release 6.2 (Final) # rpm -qa 389* 389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64 389-dsgw-1.1.11-1.el6.x86_64 389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch 389-console-1.1.7-1.el6.noarch 389-admin-1.1.35-1.el6.x86_64 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch 389-adminutil-1.1.19-1.el6.x86_64 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-48.el6_6.x86_64 I would like to know the current supported packages or stable versions for Centos 7 that are equal to the RHDS versions, I just dont want to be on the bleeding edge. Does that make sense? Also is there an upgrade path that I need to be following, any caveats that I need to be cognizant of? thank you! -- 389 users mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
