Mark,
On frame 9:
It's go until p *mod->mod_bvalues[20]
(gdb) p *mod->mod_bvalues[21]
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
On frame 7:
It's go until p *replacevals[20]
(gdb) p *replacevals[21]
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
On frame 6:
(gdb) frame 6
#6 0x00007ffff7ada6fa in entry_delete_present_values_wsi_multi_valued
(e=0x7fff8401f500, type=0x7fff84012780 "memberOf", vals=0x0,
csn=0x7fff967fb340, urp=8, mod_op=2, replacevals=0x7fff840127c0)
at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:777
777 valueset_purge(a, &a->a_present_values, csn);
(gdb) print *a
$278 = {a_type = 0x7fff84022b30 "memberOf", a_present_values = {num = 21,
max = 32, sorted = 0x7fff84023ad0, va = 0x7fff84022b50}, a_flags = 4,
a_plugin = 0x6c7e80, a_deleted_values = {num = 0, max = 0,
sorted = 0x0, va = 0x0}, a_listtofree = 0x0, a_next = 0x7fff84023c00,
a_deletioncsn = 0x7fff840247c0, a_mr_eq_plugin = 0x0, a_mr_ord_plugin =
0x0, a_mr_sub_plugin = 0x0}
(gdb) print *a->a_present_values
Structure has no component named operator*.
(gdb) print *a->a_present_values.va[0]
Thanks,
Alberto Viana
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:57 PM Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Goto frame 9 and start printing the mod:
>
> (gdb) p *mod
>
> (gdb) print i
>
> (gdb) p *mod->mod_bvalues[0]
>
> (gdb) p *mod->mod_bvalues[1]
>
> ... Keep doing that unitl its NULL
>
>
> Then goto frame 7
>
> (gdb) p *replacevals
>
> (gdb) p *replacevals[0]
>
> (gdb) p *replacevals[1]
>
> --- Keeping doing this until its NULL
>
>
> Then goto frame 6
>
> (gdb) print *a
>
> (gdb) print *a->a_present_values
>
> (gdb) print *a->a_present_values.va[0]
>
> (gdb) print *a->a_present_values.va[1]
>
> --- Keeping doing this until its NULL
>
>
> Thanks,
> Mark
>
>
> On 4/22/20 3:43 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> Yes, I'm in frame 3, and No, I do not know what modification is, sorry. I
> think thats what I'm trying to find out, why one of the servers always
> crash if I enable the replication between 2 389.
>
> Maybe reconfigure my replication, enable debug log and see where stops?
>
> What else can I do?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:34 PM Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 4/22/20 3:27 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
>>
>> Mark,
>>
>> Here's:
>> (gdb) where
>> #0 0x00007ffff455399f in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
>> #1 0x00007ffff453dcf5 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
>> #2 0x00007ffff5430cd0 in PR_Assert () at /lib64/libnspr4.so
>> #3 0x00007ffff7b71627 in slapi_valueset_done (vs=0x7fff8c022aa8) at
>> ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471
>> #4 0x00007ffff7b72257 in valueset_array_purge (a=0x7fff8c022aa0,
>> vs=0x7fff8c022aa8, csn=0x7fff977fd340) at ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:804
>> #5 0x00007ffff7b723c5 in valueset_purge (a=0x7fff8c022aa0,
>> vs=0x7fff8c022aa8, csn=0x7fff977fd340) at ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:834
>> #6 0x00007ffff7ada6fa in entry_delete_present_values_wsi_multi_valued
>> (e=0x7fff8c01f500, type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x0,
>> csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8, mod_op=2, replacevals=0x7fff8c0127c0)
>> at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:777
>> #7 0x00007ffff7ada20d in entry_delete_present_values_wsi
>> (e=0x7fff8c01f500, type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x0,
>> csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8, mod_op=2, replacevals=0x7fff8c0127c0)
>> at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:623
>> #8 0x00007ffff7adaa7a in entry_replace_present_values_wsi
>> (e=0x7fff8c01f500, type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x7fff8c0127c0,
>> csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8) at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:869
>> #9 0x00007ffff7adabf1 in entry_apply_mod_wsi (e=0x7fff8c01f500,
>> mod=0x7fff8c0127a0, csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8) at
>> ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:903
>> #10 0x00007ffff7adae52 in entry_apply_mods_wsi (e=0x7fff8c01f500,
>> smods=0x7fff977fd3c0, csn=0x7fff8c012160, urp=8) at
>> ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:973
>> #11 0x00007fffead19364 in modify_apply_check_expand
>> (pb=0x7fff8c000b20, operation=0x814160, mods=0x7fff8c012750,
>> e=0x7fff8c01bc90, ec=0x7fff8c01f480, postentry=0x7fff977fd4b0,
>> ldap_result_code=0x7fff977fd434, ldap_result_message=0x7fff977fd4d8)
>> at ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/ldbm_modify.c:247
>> #12 0x00007fffead1a430 in ldbm_back_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20) at
>> ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/ldbm_modify.c:665
>> #13 0x00007ffff7b0cd60 in op_shared_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20,
>> pw_change=0, old_pw=0x0) at ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c:1021
>> #14 0x00007ffff7b0b266 in do_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20) at
>> ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c:380
>> #15 0x000000000041592c in connection_dispatch_operation (conn=0x150e220,
>> op=0x814160, pb=0x7fff8c000b20) at ldap/servers/slapd/connection.c:638
>> #16 0x0000000000417a0e in connection_threadmain () at
>> ldap/servers/slapd/connection.c:1767
>> #17 0x00007ffff544a568 in _pt_root () at /lib64/libnspr4.so
>> #18 0x00007ffff4de52de in start_thread () at /lib64/libpthread.so.0
>> #19 0x00007ffff46184b3 in clone () at /lib64/libc.so.6
>> (gdb) print *vs->sorted[0]
>> Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffff
>>
>> Are you in the slapi_valueset_done frame?
>>
>> Do you know what the modify operation is doing? It's something with
>> memberOf, but if you knew the exact operation, and what the entry looks
>> like prior to making that update, it would be very useful to us.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alberto Viana
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:22 PM Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 4/22/20 3:15 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
>>>
>>> William,
>>>
>>> Here's:
>>>
>>> (gdb) frame 3
>>> #3 0x00007ffff7b71627 in slapi_valueset_done (vs=0x7fff8c022aa8) at
>>> ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471
>>> 471 PR_ASSERT((vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num <
>>> VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >=
>>> VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num)));
>>> (gdb) print *vs
>>> $1 = {num = 21, max = 32, sorted = 0x7fff8c023ad0, va = 0x7fff8c022b50}
>>>
>>> Can you also do a "print *vs->sorted[0]" ?
>>>
>>> And a "where" so we can see the full stack trace that leads up to this
>>> assertion?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Alberto Viana
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 8:52 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > On 18 Apr 2020, at 02:55, Alberto Viana <alberto...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi Guys,
>>>> >
>>>> > I build my own packages (from source), here's the info:
>>>> > 389-ds-base-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.x86_64.rpm
>>>> > 389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.x86_64.rpm
>>>> > python3-lib389-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.noarch.rpm
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm running in centos8.
>>>> >
>>>> > Here's what I could debug:
>>>> > https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/4d74732e4e357fbc5a27296199127a62
>>>> > https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/94fc3521024c7a508f1726923936e476
>>>>
>>>> So that assert seems to be:
>>>>
>>>> PR_ASSERT((vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num <
>>>> VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >=
>>>> VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num)));
>>>>
>>>> But it's not clear which condition here is being violated.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like your catching this in GDB though, so can you go to:
>>>>
>>>> https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/4d74732e4e357fbc5a27296199127a62
>>>>
>>>> (gdb) frame 3
>>>> (gdb) print *vs
>>>>
>>>> That would help to work out what condition is incorrectly being
>>>> asserted here.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Do you guys need something else?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> >
>>>> > Alberto Viana
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:03 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > On 1 Apr 2020, at 05:18, Mark Reynolds <mreyno...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On 3/31/20 1:36 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
>>>> > >> Hey Guys,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> 389-Directory/1.4.2.8
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> 389 (master) <=> 389 (master)
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> In a master to master replication, start to see this error :
>>>> > >> [31/Mar/2020:17:30:52.610637150 +0000] - WARN -
>>>> NSMMReplicationPlugin - replica_check_for_data_reload - Disorderly shutdown
>>>> for replica dc=rnp,dc=local. Check if DB RUV needs to be updated
>>>> >
>>>> > Also might be good to remind us what distro and packages you have
>>>> 389-ds from?
>>>> >
>>>> > > Looks like the server is crashing which is why you see these
>>>> disorderly shutdown messages. Please get a core file and take some stack
>>>> traces from it:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#sts=Debugging%C2%A0Crashes
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Can you please provide the complete logs? Also, you might want to
>>>> try re-initializing the replication agreement instead of disabling and
>>>> re-enabling replication (its less painful and it "might" solve the issue).
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Mark
>>>> > >
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Even after restart the service the problem persists, I have to
>>>> disable and re-enable replication (and replication agr) on both sides, it
>>>> works for some time, and the problem comes back.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Any tips?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Alberto Viana
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>>> > >> 389-users mailing list --
>>>> > >> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> > >> 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>>>> > >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> List Guidelines:
>>>> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> List Archives:
>>>> > >>
>>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> > > --
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 389 Directory Server Development Team
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> > > To unsubscribe send an email to
>>>> 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
>>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>>> > > List Guidelines:
>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>>> > > List Archives:
>>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> >
>>>> > —
>>>> > Sincerely,
>>>> >
>>>> > William Brown
>>>> >
>>>> > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
>>>> > SUSE Labs
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> —
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> William Brown
>>>>
>>>> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
>>>> SUSE Labs
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives:
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> 389 Directory Server Development Team
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> --
>>
>> 389 Directory Server Development Team
>>
>> --
>
> 389 Directory Server Development Team
>
>
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
