William, It's suppose to be production, but once it's not working (the replication) I just left one 389 as main server, so I can do any test as I want.
I have no idea how to do that, can you point me in the right direction? Thanks Alberto Viana On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 9:09 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> wrote: > > Is this a development/debug build? Do you have a reproducer? It would be > interesting to run this under ASAN ... > > > On 7 May 2020, at 22:31, Alberto Viana <alberto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > William, > > > > Here's: > > Assertion failure: (vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num < > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >= > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num)), at > ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471 > > Thread 17 "ns-slapd" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > > [Switching to Thread 0x7fffbbfff700 (LWP 13431)] > > 0x00007ffff455399f in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > > (gdb) frame 3 > > #3 0x00007ffff7b71627 in slapi_valueset_done (vs=0x7fffb0022aa8) at > ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471 > > 471 PR_ASSERT((vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num < > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >= > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num))); > > (gdb) print vs->sorted@21 > > $1 = {0x7fffb0023ad0, 0x7fffb0022b50, 0x4, 0x6c7e80, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, > 0x0, 0x7fffb0023c00, 0x7fffb00247c0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x25, > 0x664f7265626d656d, 0x0, 0x0, 0x115, 0x0, 0x0} > > > > Thanks > > > > Alberto Viana > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:38 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6 May 2020, at 22:40, Alberto Viana <alberto...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > William, > > > > > > Here's: > > > > > > (gdb) frame 3 > > > #3 0x00007ffff7b71627 in slapi_valueset_done (vs=0x7fffac022aa8) at > ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471 > > > 471 PR_ASSERT((vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num < > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >= > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num))); > > > (gdb) print *vs->sorted@21 > > > $1 = {18446744073709551615 <repeats 21 times>} > > > > Ahhh sorry, maybe it should be vs->sorted@21 (no *) > > > > > > > > Everything has been a quite chaotic to me too. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Alberto Viana > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:38 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> wrote: > > > So reading these frames, it's likely that this is the assert condition > failing: > > > > > > (vs->num >= VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num) > > > > > > This is because vs->sorted exists, and vs->num >= threshhold (10), so > as a result, this would indicate that vs->sorted[0] has a problem where it > must be equal to or greater than vs->num. > > > > > > Is is still possible to seethe content of the vs->sorted array? I > think you could do: > > > > > > frame 3 > > > print *vs->sorted@21 > > > > > > Sorry about the delay in responding to this, things have been hectic > for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 29 Apr 2020, at 23:40, Alberto Viana <alberto...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > William, > > > > > > > > Here's: > > > > > > > > Frame9: > > > > https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/87bf4a010bf2f7e1f97ef3ee72ee44df > > > > > > > > Frame7: > > > > https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/840f15e5df10cad0e2977cd030abdba4 > > > > > > > > Frame6: > > > > https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/befb7144b86bc4af86b9a2e0be0293a1 > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > Alberto Viana > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 11:09 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 23 Apr 2020, at 06:59, Alberto Viana <alberto...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Mark, > > > > > > > > > > On frame 9: > > > > > > > > > > It's go until p *mod->mod_bvalues[20] > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) p *mod->mod_bvalues[21] > > > > > Cannot access memory at address 0x0 > > > > > > > > > > On frame 7: > > > > > It's go until p *replacevals[20] > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) p *replacevals[21] > > > > > Cannot access memory at address 0x0 > > > > > > > > Yep, but we need to see all the outputs from 0 -> 20 and 0 -> 21 > respectively :) So copy paste the full out put please! Thanks for your > patience with this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On frame 6: > > > > > (gdb) frame 6 > > > > > #6 0x00007ffff7ada6fa in > entry_delete_present_values_wsi_multi_valued (e=0x7fff8401f500, > type=0x7fff84012780 "memberOf", vals=0x0, csn=0x7fff967fb340, urp=8, > mod_op=2, replacevals=0x7fff840127c0) > > > > > at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:777 > > > > > 777 valueset_purge(a, &a->a_present_values, csn); > > > > > (gdb) print *a > > > > > $278 = {a_type = 0x7fff84022b30 "memberOf", a_present_values = > {num = 21, max = 32, sorted = 0x7fff84023ad0, va = 0x7fff84022b50}, a_flags > = 4, a_plugin = 0x6c7e80, a_deleted_values = {num = 0, max = 0, > > > > > sorted = 0x0, va = 0x0}, a_listtofree = 0x0, a_next = > 0x7fff84023c00, a_deletioncsn = 0x7fff840247c0, a_mr_eq_plugin = 0x0, > a_mr_ord_plugin = 0x0, a_mr_sub_plugin = 0x0} > > > > > (gdb) print *a->a_present_values > > > > > Structure has no component named operator*. > > > > > (gdb) print *a->a_present_values.va[0] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Alberto Viana > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:57 PM Mark Reynolds < > mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > Goto frame 9 and start printing the mod: > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) p *mod > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) print i > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) p *mod->mod_bvalues[0] > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) p *mod->mod_bvalues[1] > > > > > > > > > > ... Keep doing that unitl its NULL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then goto frame 7 > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) p *replacevals > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) p *replacevals[0] > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) p *replacevals[1] > > > > > > > > > > --- Keeping doing this until its NULL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then goto frame 6 > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) print *a > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) print *a->a_present_values > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) print *a->a_present_values.va[0] > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) print *a->a_present_values.va[1] > > > > > > > > > > --- Keeping doing this until its NULL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4/22/20 3:43 PM, Alberto Viana wrote: > > > > >> Mark, > > > > >> > > > > >> Yes, I'm in frame 3, and No, I do not know what modification is, > sorry. I think thats what I'm trying to find out, why one of the servers > always crash if I enable the replication between 2 389. > > > > >> > > > > >> Maybe reconfigure my replication, enable debug log and see where > stops? > > > > >> > > > > >> What else can I do? > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:34 PM Mark Reynolds < > mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On 4/22/20 3:27 PM, Alberto Viana wrote: > > > > >>> Mark, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Here's: > > > > >>> (gdb) where > > > > >>> #0 0x00007ffff455399f in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6 > > > > >>> #1 0x00007ffff453dcf5 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6 > > > > >>> #2 0x00007ffff5430cd0 in PR_Assert () at /lib64/libnspr4.so > > > > >>> #3 0x00007ffff7b71627 in slapi_valueset_done > (vs=0x7fff8c022aa8) at ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471 > > > > >>> #4 0x00007ffff7b72257 in valueset_array_purge > (a=0x7fff8c022aa0, vs=0x7fff8c022aa8, csn=0x7fff977fd340) at > ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:804 > > > > >>> #5 0x00007ffff7b723c5 in valueset_purge (a=0x7fff8c022aa0, > vs=0x7fff8c022aa8, csn=0x7fff977fd340) at ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:834 > > > > >>> #6 0x00007ffff7ada6fa in > entry_delete_present_values_wsi_multi_valued (e=0x7fff8c01f500, > type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x0, csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8, > mod_op=2, replacevals=0x7fff8c0127c0) > > > > >>> at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:777 > > > > >>> #7 0x00007ffff7ada20d in entry_delete_present_values_wsi > (e=0x7fff8c01f500, type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x0, > csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8, mod_op=2, replacevals=0x7fff8c0127c0) > > > > >>> at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:623 > > > > >>> #8 0x00007ffff7adaa7a in entry_replace_present_values_wsi > (e=0x7fff8c01f500, type=0x7fff8c012780 "memberOf", vals=0x7fff8c0127c0, > csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8) at ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:869 > > > > >>> #9 0x00007ffff7adabf1 in entry_apply_mod_wsi (e=0x7fff8c01f500, > mod=0x7fff8c0127a0, csn=0x7fff977fd340, urp=8) at > ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:903 > > > > >>> #10 0x00007ffff7adae52 in entry_apply_mods_wsi > (e=0x7fff8c01f500, smods=0x7fff977fd3c0, csn=0x7fff8c012160, urp=8) at > ldap/servers/slapd/entrywsi.c:973 > > > > >>> #11 0x00007fffead19364 in modify_apply_check_expand > > > > >>> (pb=0x7fff8c000b20, operation=0x814160, mods=0x7fff8c012750, > e=0x7fff8c01bc90, ec=0x7fff8c01f480, postentry=0x7fff977fd4b0, > ldap_result_code=0x7fff977fd434, ldap_result_message=0x7fff977fd4d8) > > > > >>> at ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/ldbm_modify.c:247 > > > > >>> #12 0x00007fffead1a430 in ldbm_back_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20) > at ldap/servers/slapd/back-ldbm/ldbm_modify.c:665 > > > > >>> #13 0x00007ffff7b0cd60 in op_shared_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20, > pw_change=0, old_pw=0x0) at ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c:1021 > > > > >>> #14 0x00007ffff7b0b266 in do_modify (pb=0x7fff8c000b20) at > ldap/servers/slapd/modify.c:380 > > > > >>> #15 0x000000000041592c in connection_dispatch_operation > (conn=0x150e220, op=0x814160, pb=0x7fff8c000b20) at > ldap/servers/slapd/connection.c:638 > > > > >>> #16 0x0000000000417a0e in connection_threadmain () at > ldap/servers/slapd/connection.c:1767 > > > > >>> #17 0x00007ffff544a568 in _pt_root () at /lib64/libnspr4.so > > > > >>> #18 0x00007ffff4de52de in start_thread () at > /lib64/libpthread.so.0 > > > > >>> #19 0x00007ffff46184b3 in clone () at /lib64/libc.so.6 > > > > >>> (gdb) print *vs->sorted[0] > > > > >>> Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffff > > > > >> Are you in the slapi_valueset_done frame? > > > > >> > > > > >> Do you know what the modify operation is doing? It's something > with memberOf, but if you knew the exact operation, and what the entry > looks like prior to making that update, it would be very useful to us. > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > >> Mark > > > > >> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Alberto Viana > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 4:22 PM Mark Reynolds < > mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On 4/22/20 3:15 PM, Alberto Viana wrote: > > > > >>>> William, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Here's: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> (gdb) frame 3 > > > > >>>> #3 0x00007ffff7b71627 in slapi_valueset_done > (vs=0x7fff8c022aa8) at ldap/servers/slapd/valueset.c:471 > > > > >>>> 471 PR_ASSERT((vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num < > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >= > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num))); > > > > >>>> (gdb) print *vs > > > > >>>> $1 = {num = 21, max = 32, sorted = 0x7fff8c023ad0, va = > 0x7fff8c022b50} > > > > >>> Can you also do a "print *vs->sorted[0]" ? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> And a "where" so we can see the full stack trace that leads up > to this assertion? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Mark > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Alberto Viana > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 8:52 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> > wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > On 18 Apr 2020, at 02:55, Alberto Viana <alberto...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > Hi Guys, > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > I build my own packages (from source), here's the info: > > > > >>>> > 389-ds-base-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.x86_64.rpm > > > > >>>> > > 389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.x86_64.rpm > > > > >>>> > python3-lib389-1.4.2.8-20200414gitfae920fc8.el8.noarch.rpm > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > I'm running in centos8. > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > Here's what I could debug: > > > > >>>> > > https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/4d74732e4e357fbc5a27296199127a62 > > > > >>>> > > https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/94fc3521024c7a508f1726923936e476 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> So that assert seems to be: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> PR_ASSERT((vs->sorted == NULL) || (vs->num < > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) || ((vs->num >= > VALUESET_ARRAY_SORT_THRESHOLD) && (vs->sorted[0] < vs->num))); > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> But it's not clear which condition here is being violated. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> It looks like your catching this in GDB though, so can you go > to: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > https://gist.github.com/albertocrj/4d74732e4e357fbc5a27296199127a62 > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> (gdb) frame 3 > > > > >>>> (gdb) print *vs > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> That would help to work out what condition is incorrectly being > asserted here. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > Do you guys need something else? > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > Thanks > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > Alberto Viana > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:03 PM William Brown <wbr...@suse.de> > wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > On 1 Apr 2020, at 05:18, Mark Reynolds < > mreyno...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > On 3/31/20 1:36 PM, Alberto Viana wrote: > > > > >>>> > >> Hey Guys, > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> 389-Directory/1.4.2.8 > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> 389 (master) <=> 389 (master) > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> In a master to master replication, start to see this error > : > > > > >>>> > >> [31/Mar/2020:17:30:52.610637150 +0000] - WARN - > NSMMReplicationPlugin - replica_check_for_data_reload - Disorderly shutdown > for replica dc=rnp,dc=local. Check if DB RUV needs to be updated > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > Also might be good to remind us what distro and packages you > have 389-ds from? > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > Looks like the server is crashing which is why you see > these disorderly shutdown messages. Please get a core file and take some > stack traces from it: > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#sts=Debugging%C2%A0Crashes > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > Can you please provide the complete logs? Also, you might > want to try re-initializing the replication agreement instead of disabling > and re-enabling replication (its less painful and it "might" solve the > issue). > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > Mark > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> Even after restart the service the problem persists, I > have to disable and re-enable replication (and replication agr) on both > sides, it works for some time, and the problem comes back. > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> Any tips? > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> Thanks > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> Alberto Viana > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > >>>> > >> 389-users mailing list -- > > > > >>>> > >> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> To unsubscribe send an email to > > > > >>>> > >> 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: > > > > >>>> > >> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> List Guidelines: > > > > >>>> > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> List Archives: > > > > >>>> > >> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>>> > > -- > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > 389 Directory Server Development Team > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ > > > > >>>> > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>>> > > To unsubscribe send an email to > 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>>> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > >>>> > > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > >>>> > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > — > > > > >>>> > Sincerely, > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > William Brown > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server > > > > >>>> > SUSE Labs > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> — > > > > >>>> Sincerely, > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> William Brown > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server > > > > >>>> SUSE Labs > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> _______________________________________________ > > > > >>>> 389-users mailing list -- > > > > >>>> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to > > > > >>>> 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: > > > > >>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> List Guidelines: > > > > >>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> List Archives: > > > > >>>> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>> -- > > > > >>> > > > > >>> 389 Directory Server Development Team > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > > >>> 389-users mailing list -- > > > > >>> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>> > > > > >>> To unsubscribe send an email to > > > > >>> 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: > > > > >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > >>> > > > > >>> List Guidelines: > > > > >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > >>> > > > > >>> List Archives: > > > > >>> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > >> -- > > > > >> > > > > >> 389 Directory Server Development Team > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > 389 Directory Server Development Team > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > > > > > — > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > William Brown > > > > > > > > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server > > > > SUSE Labs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > > > — > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > William Brown > > > > > > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server > > > SUSE Labs > > > _______________________________________________ > > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > _______________________________________________ > > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > To unsubscribe send an email to > 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > — > > Sincerely, > > > > William Brown > > > > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server > > SUSE Labs > > _______________________________________________ > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > _______________________________________________ > > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > — > Sincerely, > > William Brown > > Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server > SUSE Labs > _______________________________________________ > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org