On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM, David Adams <[email protected]> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I was working at 4D in Cupertino when 4D Server > shipped. We had big arguments in the US office about IP communications and > semaphores. (Most people really don't love semaphores.) Semaphores turned > out to be the one and only reliable mechanism available. Unless something > has changed, that's still going to be true. > LR addressed that question directly at a Summit - don't know the year but it was post-Schaumburg. The only command not susceptible to timeslicing is Semaphore. -- Douglas von Roeder 949-336-2902 ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
