Jeffrey: That was how I took it.
There was a NUG thread on atomicity some time back. Perhaps there's some insight in that thread? Insofar a not Semaphoring shared resources, that'll work fine until it doesn't. Unfortunately, when it doesn't, tracking it could be, essentially, impossible. -- Douglas von Roeder 949-336-2902 On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Jeffrey Kain <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, probably the only command GUARANTEED to be atomic is Semaphore. > Other commands may happen to be in the current version, or were in previous > versions... but Semaphore always has been atomic and always will be. > > > On Nov 1, 2016, at 6:07 PM, Douglas von Roeder <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > LR addressed that question directly at a Summit - don't know the year but > > it was post-Schaumburg. The only command not susceptible to timeslicing > is > > Semaphore. > > ********************************************************************** > 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) > FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html > Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html > Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech > Unsub: mailto:[email protected] > ********************************************************************** > ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
