Hi Tim, 1017 is divisible as 9 x 113 (113 is prime), so I tried scaling down to 113.
They definitely look better now in Word, but still soft around the edges. Also they're 113 instead of 48 pts, which is going to be a bit large. When I try to re-size further in Word (Mac), they again look better, but are still slightly soft and pixellated. Does 4D Write handle EPS? When I try searching the 4D Write 14.4 document it won't find anything in Preview, and finds bits of other words in Adobe Reader. Thanks, Don >Could it be the original size of the image? > >Reducing a 480x480 image to 48x48 seems like a straightforward reduction >to 10% of the original file size with a clean division of /10... > >But reducing a 1017x1017 image to 48x48.... it seems like any way you >split it some pixels will get shifted around because you cannot divide >the pixels evenly... I mean, how would you expect a fraction of a pixel >to be displayed when each pixel represents only 1 color? > >-Tim > > >********************************************************************** >4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) >FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html >Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html >Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech >Unsub: mailto:[email protected] >********************************************************************** ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
