> Le 6 mai 2017 à 19:31, Alan Chan via 4D_Tech <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi Arnaud, > > First of all, it seems we have reverse definition of Diacritical.
Yes, it's quite confusing, I don't like to use it. Diacritic: "a glyph added to a letter" (a+`=à, ’+e=é…). But "diacritical search" means nothing to me if "sensitive or insensitive" isn't mentioned. Here they do it and it's not confusing: <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb231283(v=vs.85).aspx> Ligature: "two or more graphemes or letters are joined as a single glyph" (o+e=œ, a+e=æ…). In french 4D, search correctly compares some of these. They are not diacritics, as far as I know. I suppose other langages have their own particularities. All this to say that I prefer to say "strict", it's short and obvious it is "strict comparison of char code". And "not strict" takes in account various rules depending on various langages. -- Arnaud de Montard ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
