On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Kirk Brooks via 4D_Tech < [email protected]> wrote:
> David, > Thanks for throwing this in. It really does make more sense to use a > longint even if it is (currently) only a binary choice. > Kirk: If you're using a number to represent a hierarchy, the surest way to think of another category "after the code is done" is to use 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. as integers. Prior experience with Murphy would make me lean toward 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 so as to allow 15, 17, 38, etc. -- Douglas von Roeder 949-336-2902 ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
