Chris, What is wrong with the suggestion made by Lutz concerning the use of the "Execute On Server" method attribute?
Best, Steve -----Original Message----- From: 4D_Tech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Belanger via 4D_Tech Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 9:33 AM To: 4D iNUG Technical <[email protected]> Cc: Chris Belanger <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Storage — Server vs Client I was hoping there was a way to access the storage object on the server from a client. it would make a lot of things very simple. For example, the record key sequencing would be very simple. Is there a way to access the shared objects of another machine (i.e. server or another client)? regards, Chris > On Sep 10, 2018, at 1:47 AM, Epperlein, Lutz (agendo) via 4D_Tech > <[email protected]> wrote: > > If I'm not wrong the explanation is simple. If you access the storage on the > client you get the storage of the client, on the server you get the storage > object of the server. If you want to access the server's storage you can use > something like EXECUTE ON SERVER or the appropriate attribute of the method. > > Please correct me, if I'm wrong > > Regards > Lutz ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
