Thanks!

on the first look it would appear to be simpler/faster to use Sql.

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:15:48 +0100, Arnaud de Montard via 4D_Tech wrote:
> 
>> Le 10 janv. 2019 à 20:21, cjmiller--- via 4D_Tech 
>> <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a écrit :
>> 
>> You could run it on server 
> 
> Running a method on server is great if there a lot of data to read 
> and/or write, because it avoids the transfer of these data through 
> network. Here the data is very small, time to ask server to run the 
> method and time to get that little data will be the same. Some times:
> - using SQL ~ 250 ms 1st time, then ~60 ms (I don't know why 1st time 
> is longer, BTW)
> - loop ~ 9 ms (and the server can do something better for other clients)
> 
> -- 
> Arnaud de Montard 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************************************
> 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
> Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
> Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
> Unsub:  mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com
> **********************************************************************
---------------
Gas is for washing parts
Alcohol is for drinkin'
Nitromethane is for racing 
**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub:  mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to