> Le 8 févr. 2019 à 20:18, Christian Sakowski via 4D_Tech 
> <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> a écrit :
>> I went much simpler…
> This is quite the same, but the problem with this approach is, that i cannot 
> parse relations generically.

I do agree, a name that allows to identify the function is great:
  find regex("^FK_";property;1) -> foreign key
  find regex("_p$";property;1) -> many to one relation
And these names are not supposed to change every day…  

Arnaud de Montard 

4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub:  mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com

Reply via email to