I always use singular table names and the relationship names are singular or 
plural based on their type. For example, I have a structure that imports 4D 
code and builds a database of each method path and the related methods it 
directly calls:

[Method_Call]ID

[Method_Call]Caller_Method_ID -> [Method]ID
M to 1: Caller
1 to M: Method_Callers

[Method_Call]Callee_Method_ID -> [Method]ID
M to 1: Callee
1 to M: Method_Callees

John DeSoi, Ph.D.



> On Feb 8, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Ed Hammond via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hey all of you ORDA pioneers and converts!
> 
> 
> Have any of you come up with a convention for naming relations for use with 
> ORDA? What have you found that works? or doesn't?

**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub:  mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to