I always use singular table names and the relationship names are singular or plural based on their type. For example, I have a structure that imports 4D code and builds a database of each method path and the related methods it directly calls:
[Method_Call]ID [Method_Call]Caller_Method_ID -> [Method]ID M to 1: Caller 1 to M: Method_Callers [Method_Call]Callee_Method_ID -> [Method]ID M to 1: Callee 1 to M: Method_Callees John DeSoi, Ph.D. > On Feb 8, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Ed Hammond via 4D_Tech <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hey all of you ORDA pioneers and converts! > > > Have any of you come up with a convention for naming relations for use with > ORDA? What have you found that works? or doesn't? ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
