Hi,
A few commenters have suggested placing a 4D Web server behind a proxy server. The problem as described can be very easily solved with very little change in complexity and without involving other technologies. One of the reasons we all use 4D is that it allows us to solve problems with less complexity. I suggest that developers should try to use just the 4D web server unless you have a good reason not to. Most of the time when I’ve encountered more complex web architectures involving 4D and other technologies, it didn’t solve much of anything and just made maintenance and development more difficult. Can anyone come up with an anecdote of any actual exploited vulnerabilities of a well constructed 4D web site? Tom DeMeo ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
