Hi Gabriel,

>> When jackdmp 1.9.1 was renamed to JACK2 I believed that JACK1
>> development was giving way to the newer C++ implementation, but that
>> does not appear to be the case now.
> 
> I think he was asking for some manner of libjack-dbg 
> package so that he could get a sane backtrace.

Right, but I meant that if we switch back to JACK1, then this bug may
not get followed up. I'm also looking into JACK MIDI to see if we can
satisfy Ralf's timing requirements that way :-)

Cheers!

Daniel
_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

Reply via email to