Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
>   
>> could you please add a JACK debuginfo version to the repository or send
>> it by email?
>>     
>
> There's an open question about whether we will use JACK2 or JACK1 for
> future distros, since JACK 0.118.0 shows that JACK1 development is still
> very much alive.
>
> When jackdmp 1.9.1 was renamed to JACK2 I believed that JACK1
> development was giving way to the newer C++ implementation, but that
> does not appear to be the case now.
>
> Cheers!
>
> Daniel
>   

JACK 1 on many machines, for people who are happy with Linux, is still 
the merrily client disconnector. And within this and last month I guess 
I wasn't the only one on audio mailing lists, having now issues when 
using JACK 2 too, anyway JACK 2 seems to be the better choice. I don't 
know the reason, why most major distros now switch to JACK 2, this could 
regard to other issues, dunno, pulseaudio, dbus, session handling.

I didn't test current JACK 1, perhaps I should do it for 3.3 alpha and 
report, if I could run Qtractor + Rakarrack without issues, or if JACK 1 
still will disconnect clients on my machine too.

I try to test it during the weekend or next week. I'll compile current 
JACK 1 if the repositories version should be outdated.

Cheers!

Ralf
_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@lists.64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

Reply via email to