Daniel James wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > >> could you please add a JACK debuginfo version to the repository or send >> it by email? >> > > There's an open question about whether we will use JACK2 or JACK1 for > future distros, since JACK 0.118.0 shows that JACK1 development is still > very much alive. > > When jackdmp 1.9.1 was renamed to JACK2 I believed that JACK1 > development was giving way to the newer C++ implementation, but that > does not appear to be the case now. > > Cheers! > > Daniel >
JACK 1 on many machines, for people who are happy with Linux, is still the merrily client disconnector. And within this and last month I guess I wasn't the only one on audio mailing lists, having now issues when using JACK 2 too, anyway JACK 2 seems to be the better choice. I don't know the reason, why most major distros now switch to JACK 2, this could regard to other issues, dunno, pulseaudio, dbus, session handling. I didn't test current JACK 1, perhaps I should do it for 3.3 alpha and report, if I could run Qtractor + Rakarrack without issues, or if JACK 1 still will disconnect clients on my machine too. I try to test it during the weekend or next week. I'll compile current JACK 1 if the repositories version should be outdated. Cheers! Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-devel mailing list 64studio-devel@lists.64studio.com http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel