Rua Haszard Morris wrote:
> When I first started playing around with 64studio I often would apt-get 
> fluxbox and some other WMs under the impression that I would prefer them, and 
> it was easy to set up - just add the appropriate debian repository (the one 
> that corresponds to the 64studio dist), apt-get install the wms you want, and 
> they are added to the options in GDM, where you can also set which one you 
> want to be the default.
>
> So I _think_ (haven't tried in a while) that using fluxbox with 64studio is 
> very straightforward to set up, give it a try...
>
> btw, since playing around with WMs became addicted to GNOME and its 
> simplicity, and rough equivalence with other OS window managers/desktops, 
> especially for things like drag/drop.
>
> have fun
> Rua HM.

I prefer KDE and it's easy to install. Fluxbox doesn't really need less
resources, if people like to have something that needs less resources,
they should use something frame based instead of a WM/DE, I like Ion
very much, but at the moment I'm only using KDE3, KDE4 and GNOME for my
Linux.

Maybe there are some default settings for 64 Studio taht can cause
confusion. My KDE for 64 Studio has a KPowersafe, where CPU Frequency
Policy isn't supported. I guess that there might be things like that for
people who install fluxbox.

It's easy to install any WM/DE alternative, but maybe they have troubles
with some special settings.

I prefer GNOME instead of Fluxbox, or better KDE3, but more important
will be, to have applications like jackEQ and better mixing consoles
like this, jconv, jack_snapshot, qtractor and rakarrak.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to