Grammostola Rosea wrote: > Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Dragan Noveski wrote: >> >>>> GNOME for me is the happy >>>> medium. I don't give a damm on what a Shuttleworth project does, but >>>> GNOME seems to be the best choice for everyone. >>>> >>> well, i am able to come around with gnome too, but it is not the best >>> choice for me and probably for some others. so it is not the best >>> choice for everyone. >>> >> >> This is a result of my broken English, I noticed this right after I sent >> my mail. >> It's the best choice for a distro, that will only provide 1 WM/DE to >> keep downloads small and fast, because GNOME is the happy medium. It's >> not like KDE and it's not like Fluxbox, but it is in the middle and for >> usage it's similar to 98se and XP. >> > Is kde4 not more similar to Windows Vista? And so better for > 'windows-converts'? > > \r
I don't know enough about Vista, but I guess you're right. For Suse KDE4 also is stable on my machine, anyway, KDE4 isn't the happy medium, you won't have KDE3 or KDE4 running on a computer with a slow CPU and less RAM. It's also possible to have a Windows like Menu for KDE3 and to set a KDE to a Windows like behaviour. 64 Studio shouldn't be like Windows, it just should have a WM/DE, that allows switching from Microsoft to Linux, without learning to much new for a beginner. The happy medium should fit to native Linux users and Windows users with any PC and the 64 Studio install media should be small enough for a fast download. I guess this is the thought. Just my opinion, Ralf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
