-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The JUGList Team wrote: > I am planning on installing 64Studio 3.0beta3 on a Dell Latitude > (AMD64x2 w 2GB memory) that I plan on using for recording. I am no > stranger to recording on linux, and have been using openSUSE/Jacklab for > some time. However, I am not satisfied with openSUSE's performance on > this particular machine, and found Ubuntu Studio Hardy (or Intrepid, but > Intrepid's kernel-rt is crippled) a better fit. I'd always wanted to try > 64 Studio, and since the beta3 is based on Hardy, I am fairly confident > that it will handle my hardware (I'm waiting for a new hard drive to > arrive). However, I am a bit confused as to how the devs are planning to > change the base from Ubuntu Hardy to Debian Lenny for the final release?
This is not planned (search the archives, I believe Daniel has already answered this question) > > Lenny runs a 2.6.26 kernel, while Hardy is 2.6.24. But the > kernel-multimedia in 64Studio's repo is at 2.6.29? So what's the final > 64Studio going to use? Is the 2.6.29 kernel going to be the release kernel? > Whatever is stable and works. 2.6.29 is not yet officially stable. Having said that I have been getting acceptable results from 2.6.28. > Also, if I install beta3, will I by able to update the installation to > 3.0 when it's released? > The usual apt-get/aptitude/.. will update your machine in place (ie. you won't need to reinstall when 3.0 is released). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm80yoACgkQwRXgH3rKGfME2ACcDEjAa+dJozLVj9Kn+f9RGzGR fYQAmQGdvFPdXxzgrNcgEa9KBZ5AgoOd =IbRF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
