Daniel James wrote: > Hi Tapani, > >> So, what should I do to get Jack >= 0.116 (without having to compile >> it)? > > I personally would stick with Jack 1.9.2, because it represents the > future of the software (it's a re-implementation and therefore much > closer to what will be official Jack 2). > > Cheers! > > Daniel
Hi Daniel, Thanks for your reply. But I'm still a bit confused about how to get Jack 1.9.2 for 64 Studio 3.0 beta (64-bit, upgraded from Mint/Hardy). Should I compile it, because Jack 1.9.2 seems not to be available in the 64studio Hardy backport repos? There is jackd_1.8+0.71-0.64studio2~hardy1_i386.deb, but there is no jackd_1.8+0.71-0.64studio2~hardy1_amd64.deb either. http://apt.64studio.com/backports/pool/main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit At moment the only option in the repos is Ubuntu's default Jack 0.109.2-1ubuntu1 (Hardy). Greetings, Tapani _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
