Grammostola Rosea wrote: > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> For the Rivendell search both were perfect. Okay, for Clusty I can set a >> language option, that perhaps needs to be renewed, when I delete cookies >> and it won't work anyway. I guess it's better for Google. Maybe we all >> can check whether Clusty is able to replace Google and keep watching for >> other alternatives too. >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> > www.ixquick.com > > I think that's an good alternative to add. But don't remove Google > cause most people want to use that (unfortunately)
I'm nearly only using Google, very seldom Yahoo, Clusty or what ever else. The problem is, that if we don't use alternative search engines to Google, Yahoo etc. very often, they can't know what search results are wanted by us. We teach Google day by day, but we don't teach alternative search engines. Btw. I don't know if Clusty don't do political censorship and I don't know, if it's true that ixquick don't behave as bad as Google with my data. For me it's an ambivalent issue what search engine to use. It might be a bad habit that I use Google really MOST of the times. _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
