Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> installation failed because an error occurred.
>
> The system is an ASUS M2A-VM HDMI with HDMI disabled. The graphics is an
> integrated ATI Radeon "X 1250-based".
>
> I'm running 64 Studio 3.0-beta3, http://www.64studio.com/, with latest
> packages upgrades. 64 Studio is Ubuntu Hardy and the beta version is
> stable on my machine, excepted of MIDI jitter for external MIDI devices.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> r...@64studio:/usr/src/ati# sh ati-driver-installer-9-3-x86.x86_64.run
> --buildpkg Ubuntu/hardy
> Created directory fglrx-install.X29528
> Verifying archive integrity... All good.
> [snip]
> Generating package: Ubuntu/hardy
> Resolving build dependencies...
> Continuing package build
> Package /usr/src/ati/xorg-driver-fglrx_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb has been
> successfully generated
> Package /usr/src/ati/xorg-driver-fglrx-dev_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb has
> been successfully generated
> Package /usr/src/ati/fglrx-kernel-source_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb has
> been successfully generated
> Package /usr/src/ati/fglrx-amdcccle_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb has been
> successfully generated
> Package /usr/src/ati/fglrx-modaliases_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb has been
> successfully generated
> Package /usr/src/ati/libamdxvba1_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb has been
> successfully generated
> Removing temporary directory: fglrx-install.X29528
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> r...@64studio:/usr/src/ati# dpkg -i
> fglrx-kernel-source_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
> fglrx-modaliases_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
> xorg-driver-fglrx_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
> Selecting previously deselected package fglrx-kernel-source.
> (Reading database ... 153537 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking fglrx-kernel-source (from
> fglrx-kernel-source_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
> Selecting previously deselected package fglrx-modaliases.
> Unpacking fglrx-modaliases (from
> fglrx-modaliases_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
> Selecting previously deselected package xorg-driver-fglrx.
> Unpacking xorg-driver-fglrx (from
> xorg-driver-fglrx_8.593-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
> Setting up fglrx-kernel-source (2:8.593-0ubuntu1) ...
> Adding Module to DKMS build system
> Doing initial module build
>
> Error! Build of fglrx.ko failed for: 2.6.29-1-multimedia-amd64 (x86_64)
> Consult the make.log in the build directory
> /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.593/build/ for more information.
> Installing initial module
>
> Error! Could not locate fglrx.ko for module fglrx in the DKMS tree.
> You must run a dkms build for kernel 2.6.29-1-multimedia-amd64 (x86_64)
> first.
> Done.
>
> Setting up fglrx-modaliases (2:8.593-0ubuntu1) ...
> Setting up xorg-driver-fglrx (2:8.593-0ubuntu1) ...
>
> Processing triggers for libc6 ...
> ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> r...@64studio:/usr/src/ati# cat /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.593/build/make.log
> DKMS make.log for fglrx-8.593 for kernel 2.6.29-1-multimedia-amd64 (x86_64)
> Wed Aug 5 17:58:12 CEST 2009
> /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.593/build
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This is the complete output for "cat
> /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.593/build/make.log".
>
> This seems to be a bug, I found this thread:
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1225967
> And this one:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/320986
> Because of my broken English I also read this thread on German:
> http://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/aktuelles-zur-fglrx-problematik-bei-intrepid-/4/
> There are much more links about this issue:
> http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=dkms+build+fglrx&meta=&aq=3&oq=dkms+build
>
> For the standard, non-real-time Ubuntu kernel there's a pre-build
> package for "xorg-driver-fglrx" in the repositories.
>
> At least it would be good if there would be a howto on easy to
> understand English, to solves the problem. Bug reports, that might have
> a solution, but embedded in a discussion, aren't a help for many people
> that do not understand English very well.
>
> Hopefully ATI is interested in supporting customers that run Linux. If
> not it would be wise to buy other graphics or mobos with other on-board
> graphics, but ATI in the future.
>
> I'll send a copy of this mail to AMD's German Graphics Technical Support
> by email web form.
>
> Feel free to contact me on English or on German!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ralf Mardorf
Sending a copy to AMD by email web form failed:
Server Error in '/' Application.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
/A potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected from the
client (tbLongDescription="...f Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-...")./
* Description: *Request Validation has detected a potentially dangerous
client input value, and processing of the request has been aborted. This
value may indicate an attempt to compromise the security of your
application, such as a cross-site scripting attack. You can disable
request validation by setting validateRequest=false in the Page
directive or in the configuration section. However, it is strongly
recommended that your application explicitly check all inputs in this case.
* Exception Details: *System.Web.HttpRequestValidationException: A
potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected from the client
(tbLongDescription="...f Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-...").
*Source Error:*
||
[No relevant source lines]
* Source File: * c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary
ASP.NET Files\root\747d9f1a\fa76fa35\App_Web_qo01ju0o.0.cs* Line: * 0
*Stack Trace:*
||
[HttpRequestValidationException (0x80004005): A potentially dangerous
Request.Form value was detected from the client (tbLongDescription="...f
Mardorf <ralf.mard...@alice-...").]
System.Web.HttpRequest.ValidateString(String s, String valueName, String
collectionName) +8721914
System.Web.HttpRequest.ValidateNameValueCollection(NameValueCollection nvc,
String collectionName) +111
System.Web.HttpRequest.get_Form() +129
System.Web.HttpRequest.get_HasForm() +8722023
System.Web.UI.Page.GetCollectionBasedOnMethod(Boolean dontReturnNull) +97
System.Web.UI.Page.DeterminePostBackMode() +63
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint,
Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +6785
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint,
Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +242
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest() +80
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestWithNoAssert(HttpContext context) +21
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) +49
ASP.default_aspx.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) in
c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET
Files\root\747d9f1a\fa76fa35\App_Web_qo01ju0o.0.cs:0
System.Web.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
+181
System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean&
completedSynchronously) +75
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Version Information:* Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.3082;
ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.3082
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
