Gustin Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>   
>> Gustin Johnson wrote:
>>     
>>> Seriously?  I have no idea what you use or don't use. He made a
>>> suggestion and you chastised him.  I guess we should all keep our mouths
>>> shut.  We do not work for you, take some responsibility for your own
>>> experience.  This is what I dislike most about FLOSS, all of the self
>>> righteous, self important, and indignant people that expect the world to
>>> be given to them for free.
>>>   
>>>       
>> This wasn't addressed to you ;). He suggested to ban me from this list
>>     
>
> It was posted to a mailing list to which I subscribe.  If you want to
> ensure that I do not respond, do not send the message to the list.  As
> it is, I get choose what I reply to.
>
>   
>> and was writing about another list were a woman was banned. He wrote
>> about making research, he knows that I e.g. use Qtractor and he
>>     
>
> I am not on that list so I have no idea what the context is.  I am only
> commenting on what I see here.
>   

Me too, maybe nobody here knows this list, this situation, only that 
there might be a woman that did not obey to Kevin's rules.

>> suggested a session handler without making his homework. I didn't ask
>>     
>
> Are you suggesting that he do your homework for you?
>
>   
>> for a session handler, but I guess newbies would be confused to read
>> about LASH to handle Qtractor sessions ;). I didn't start this flame,
>>     
>
> I am not exactly sure what you *are* asking for.  He made a suggestion
> and then you pounced on him.  The very same decency that you want for
> yourself you seem unwilling to give to others.  I believe it was Ghandi
> who said your should be the change that you wish to see in the world.
>   

I'm not a friend of rich bigwigs like Ghandi, I'm more fine with Zapata.
I did ask for POSIX standard on shell scripts, after a long research. 
Note that I still posted a script using "eval" instead of arrays. So I 
guess I did my homework very well. At some point it should be allowed to 
ask. Nobody did ask for a session handler and especially LASH is less 
useful until a lot of apps don't work with LASH and I guess with LADISH too.

>> but he calls me a liar, while he is a liar and I'm not.
>>
>>     
> Seriously, if you want to be treated better then do not descend into
> name calling.  It does not matter if someone else starts first, you
> simply have to be better than that.
>   

If I call him an agitating liar, than this simply is what he is, anyway, 
I'll unsubsribe too.

Btw. I'm invented by Mathias and Rui to join the Qtractor dev list. Why 
does he speak for Rui?

>> I don't need to accept this.
>>
>>     
> You can choose to participate or not.  You are correct that the choice
> is yours to make.
>
> Unfortunately, you do not get to decide other people's behavior.  You do
> not get to impose your views on others.
>
>   
>>>> Please read the mails, especially of people you like to diss!
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> I will read or ignore what I like, just as you are free to read or
>>> ignore me.
>>>       
>> That's fine, but it was addressed to him ... okay he blocks my mails,
>> but anyway, it's not fair to spread lies about me.
>>
>>     
> If you do not wish for me to comment, then send your messages directly
> to your intended recipient(s).

Ralf
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to