-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Mardorf wrote: <snip> >> >> >>> and was writing about another list were a woman was banned. He wrote >>> about making research, he knows that I e.g. use Qtractor and he >>> >> >> I am not on that list so I have no idea what the context is. I am only >> commenting on what I see here. >> > Me too, maybe nobody here knows this list, this situation, only that > there might be a woman that did not obey to Kevin's rules. > Again, since I was not a witness to that conversation, it would be inappropriate for me to comment. It is also inappropriate for you to editorialize here when we are also missing that context.
>>> suggested a session handler without making his homework. I didn't ask >>> >> Are you suggesting that he do your homework for you? >> >> >>> for a session handler, but I guess newbies would be confused to read >>> about LASH to handle Qtractor sessions ;). I didn't start this flame, >>> >> >> I am not exactly sure what you *are* asking for. He made a suggestion >> and then you pounced on him. The very same decency that you want for >> yourself you seem unwilling to give to others. I believe it was Ghandi >> who said your should be the change that you wish to see in the world. >> > > I'm not a friend of rich bigwigs like Ghandi, I'm more fine with Zapata. Whatever. I still believe that the particular statement is valid. > I did ask for POSIX standard on shell scripts, after a long research. > Note that I still posted a script using "eval" instead of arrays. So I > guess I did my homework very well. At some point it should be allowed to I do not say this to be mean, but there is a lot of room for improvement in your research skills. Most of the questions you had were already answered. In fact the first two links that I posted contained the bulk of the info you were looking for, and a simple google search would have led you to the rest. > ask. Nobody did ask for a session handler and especially LASH is less > useful until a lot of apps don't work with LASH and I guess with LADISH > too. This is not something I use nor care about. As a result I can't help here. > >>> but he calls me a liar, while he is a liar and I'm not. >>> >>> >> Seriously, if you want to be treated better then do not descend into >> name calling. It does not matter if someone else starts first, you >> simply have to be better than that. >> > > If I call him an agitating liar, than this simply is what he is, anyway, No, that is simply what you are calling him. I am consistently impressed with your command of the English language with respect to evoking emotional responses. > I'll unsubsribe too. Again, this is your choice. Best of luck in the future. > > Btw. I'm invented by Mathias and Rui to join the Qtractor dev list. Why > does he speak for Rui? > Again, I am not on that list, I have no idea what is going on over there. <snip> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFK1gNvwRXgH3rKGfMRAngoAKCb7I9EaxoR/rOEp/EXb4HbsfpXeACeIrVG audF0SQRHi4MZ+IVvsHSLbo= =KzO3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
