Daniel James wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > >> Why not removing Pulseaudio like 64 Studio does? >> > > Pulseaudio is designed for a different use case from the typical JACK > user. I don't think there is any transport sync or MIDI support in > Pulseaudio, although I'm happy to be corrected on that. >
I never missed pulseaudio when using 64 Studio, but I had a lot of trouble when using other distros, since I migrated from KDE to GNOME and I'm not sitting in my home studio and use JACK only, but I'm an averaged user who uses 64 Studio as his "desktop" operating system. >> What's about a joint venture with an existing multimedia distro based on >> Ubuntu, e.g. 64 Studio or openArtist or ...? >> > > Canonical already supports Ubuntu Studio, in principle. I doubt the pro > audio market is big enough for Canonical to be interested in investing > in, compared to the size of the general computing market. > Hm, I shouldn't write what I'm thinking about Mr. Shuttleworth, so I'll be quiet. >> there >> will be a new multimedia distro each month and all of them needs >> maintainers. >> > > Quite right, this is why we take a different, commercial approach from > other distros, in an attempt to achieve long-term sustainability. > There's a reason for Ralf, who is nagging all the time, that he keeps on using 64 Studio ;). You do a good job and I don't have to pay for you and you never ask for donations and you never ... what ever ... Thank you for 64 Studio, Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
