Daniel James wrote: > Hi all, > > A couple of weeks ago, I did a phone-in presentation on Red Hat's > community site, opensource.com. It was about Free Software and > innovation in the music industry. The slides and audio are now available > via an archive link on this page: > > http://opensource.com/life/10/6/rock-n-roll-instant-messaging-creative-commons > > Cheers! > > Daniel
Hi all, hi Daniel :) "closed source tools such as Protools and Autotune are pushing out cookie-cutter sounds" Not the quality of the tools is bad. The idea of closed source is bad. The usage of this software is bad. But OTOH, I never heard of all the issues regarding to jitter, latency compensation, sync, disconnecting audio ports for this proprietary software. I'm in contact with people who changed from Linux to this kind of software, because they experienced jitter, latency compensation, sync, disconnecting audio ports issues for Linux too. A lot of people in my age, children of the 80ies, switched from the Ataris and analog world to Linux first, but then needed to use Apple and Microsoft based solutions, because Linux failed much too much, anyway they do use FLOSS on other OSS' too. It's possible to do non-cookie-cutter sounds by using proprietary software. I'm pro CC, but perhaps I have enough to eat, because friends prefer GEMA ;). And let me tell you, those GEMA musicians give away recordings for free too. This is a biased presentation, similar to the biased presentations of the proprietary crowd. I'm not fine with this black and white paintings. It all comes with advantages and disadvantages, even pure analog equipment, the only equipment without bizarre annoying technical issues, has it's disadvantages, prime cost and care. 0,02 €, Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
