Dear Rashid Sangi.

Thanks for your valuable comments.

I think that the comments are reasonable and they are useful.

In the revision of the draft, I will reflect the comments.

Best regards.

Yong-Geun.


On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:37 PM, AbdurRashidSangi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Yong-Geun,
>
>
>
> As per my understanding after quick review, following are some editorial
> and further explanation of some details you mentioned in the draft:
>
>
>
> 1.  3.2. first para: better further define IPSS or completely exclude it.
>
> 2.  3.3. third para: "Portable Parts (PP) attached" - instead of - "PP
> attached".
>
> 3.  4. Design Space. first and second para: incorrect reference of "RFC
> 6558" - instead of - "RFC 6568"
>
> 4.  5.1. first para: suitably rephrasing "However, the person data" to let
> suppose "However, the personal data, which pose serious issues if
> mishandled while transferred in wireless domain, can be securely
> transferred by NFC technology".
>
> 5.  5.3. Reliability & QoS: "Latency of *SENSOR READINGS*" should be low
> for".
>
> 6.  5.4. first para: "communications" - instead of - "communicatios".
>
> 7.  5.5. first para: "Therefore, the use case of LTE MTC could be used in
> LPWAN" - instead of - "Therefore, the use....".
>
> 8.  5.5. example: if you are referring to connectivity between end device
> and LPWAN gateway, how about using the term "fronthaul" instead of
> "backhaul"?
>
> 9.  5.5. example: "star of star topology" - instead of - "star of stat
> topology".
>
> 10. 5.5. example: Maximum data rate is mentioned for LoRa; keeping the
> consideration of bandwidth aggregation recently proposed in
> "draft-qin-lpwan-dau-00" would be better.
>
>
>
> Afterward, we can keep rephrasing the sentence that requires some
> modifications.
>
>
>
> Hope you find the suggestions, useful.
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Rashid Sangi,
>
> Huawei, Beijing, China.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* 6lo [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Samita
> Chakrabarti
> *Sent:* 2016年5月14日 8:41
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [6lo] Call for 6lo Deployment Scenario Document phone
> meeting
>
>
>
>
>
> PS: Please update the Doodle poll for your preference on attendance. [ for
> next week]
>
> http://doodle.com/poll/y9akcyphnrtvwusa
>
>
>
>
>
> Please reply only to ‘[email protected]’.  [ Else the mail administrator
> complains about too many recipients]
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Samita
>
>
>
> *From:* Samita Chakrabarti
> *Sent:* Friday, May 13, 2016 5:28 PM
> *To:* Yong-Geun Hong ([email protected]); [email protected];
> Thomas Watteyne ([email protected]); [email protected]; Carsten
> Bormann ([email protected]); Mohit Sethi M; [email protected];
> 'Das, Subir'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
> Alexander Pelov ([email protected]); Gabriel Montenegro (
> [email protected])
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Call for 6lo Deployment Scenario Document phone meeting
>
>
>
> Hello All:
>
>
>
> At Buenos Aires, we had a very productive discussion on updating
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hong-6lo-use-cases/
>
> In order to use it more for guidance to other IETF WGs and external SDO as
> to how 6lo WG technologies might be useful to yet another L2 networks that
> are serving constrained devices.
>
> The document already discusses different parameters for different
> technologies  and typical deployment.
>
>
>
> The goal is to improve the document  and present it as an 6lo
> Applicability document for others to know how to use this technology.
>
>
>
> Yong-Geun is heading this effort and  he might need some extra hands to
> help him out.
>
>
>
> I plan to arrange a phone meeting next week (Wed/Thurs) @7am PDT to
> discuss:
>
>
>
> ·         Outline proposal of the updated document
>
> ·         Nail down the usecase scenarios
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Samita
>
>
>
>
>
> PS: Please update the Doodle poll for your preference on attendance.
>
> http://doodle.com/poll/y9akcyphnrtvwusa
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lo mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
>
>
_______________________________________________
6lo mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo

Reply via email to